← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Mithras
Thread ID: 10746 | Posts: 13 | Started: 2003-10-25
2003-10-25 23:41 | User Profile
[B]Austria[/B] Freedom Party (FPO) [url]http://www.fpoe.at/[/url]
[B]Australia[/B] Australia First Party (AFP) [url]http://www.australiafirstparty.com.au/[/url]
Australian National Action (ANA) [url]http://www.nationalaction.cjb.net/[/url]
National Republicans (NR) [url]http://www.alphalink.com.au/~eureka/[/url]
[B]Belgium[/B] Flemish Bloc (VB) [url]http://www.vlaamsblok.be/[/url]
New Front of Belgium (FNB) [url]http://www.fnb.be/[/url]
[B]Canada[/B] Freedom Party (FP) [url]http://www.freedomparty.ca/[/url]
[B]Croatia[/B] Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) [url]http://www.hdz.hr/[/url]
[B]Denmark[/B] Danish Folks Party (DF) [url]http://www.danskfolkeparti.dk/[/url]
Progress Party (FRP) [url]http://www.frp.dk/[/url]
[B]Estonia[/B] Fatherland Union (IA) [url]http://www.isamaaliit.ee/[/url]
[B]Finland[/B] League for Free Finland (VSL) [url]http://www.vapaansuomenliitto.fi/[/url]
[B]France[/B] National Front (FN) [url]http://www.frontnational.com/[/url]
[B]Germany[/B] German Folks Union (DVU) [url]http://www.dvu.de/[/url]
National Democratic Party (NPD) [url]http://www.npd.de/[/url]
Republican Party (REP) [url]http://www.rep.de/[/url]
[B]Greece[/B] Hellenic Front [url]http://www.metopo.gr/[/url]
[B]Hungary[/B] Justice and Life (MIEP) [url]http://www.miep.hu/[/url]
[B]Italy[/B] Northern League (LN) [url]http://www.leganord.org/[/url]
National Alliance (AN) [url]http://www.alleanzanazionale.it/[/url]
Tricolor Flame (MSFT) [url]http://www.msifiammatric.it/[/url]
[B]Latvia[/B] Fatherland and Freedom (TB) [url]http://www.tb.lv/[/url]
[B]Netherlands[/B] Livable Netherlands (LN) [url]http://www.leefbaar-nederland.nl/[/url]
New National Party (NNP) [url]http://www.nieuwenationalepartij.org/[/url]
[B]New Zealand[/B] New Zealand First (NZF) [url]http://www.nzfirst.org.nz/[/url]
[B]Norway[/B] Progress Party (FRP) [url]http://www.frp.no/[/url]
[B]Poland[/B] League of Polish Families (LPR) [url]http://www.lpr.pl/[/url]
[B]Romania[/B] Great Romania (PRM) [url]http://www.romare.ro/[/url]
[B]Russia[/B] Russian National Alliance (RNE) [url]http://www.rne.org/[/url]
[B]Scotland[/B] Scottish National Party (SNP) [url]http://www.snp.org/[/url]
[B]Slovenia[/B] Slovenian National Party (SNS) [url]http://www.sns.si/[/url]
[B]Sweden[/B] National Democrats (ND) [url]http://www.nationaldemokraterna.se/[/url]
Swedish Democrats (SDU) [url]http://www.sverigedemokraterna.se/[/url]
[B]Switzerland[/B] Liberty Party (FPS) [url]http://www.freiheits-partei.ch/[/url]
Swiss Folks Party (SVP) [url]http://www.svp.ch/[/url]
[B]United Kingdom[/B] British National Party (BNP) [url]http://www.bnp.org.uk/[/url]
[B]United States[/B] America First Party (AFP) [url]http://www.americafirstparty.org/[/url]
[B]International[/B] International Monarchist League [url]http://www.monarchy.net/[/url]
2003-10-26 00:14 | User Profile
Not a bad collection.
[QUOTE=Mithras] [B]Russia[/B] Russian National Alliance (RNE) [url]http://www.rne.org/[/url] [/QUOTE]
What only one Russian party? Well heres some more
Pamyat [url]http://www.pamyat.ru/engl.html[/url]
Russian NS Party [url]http://www.nationalism.org/rnsp/display_ENG.htm[/url]
Russian nationalism in general [url]http://www.nationalism.org/about-english.htm[/url]
Alexander Dugin's Eurasian movement [url]http://www.evrazia.org/index.php?newlang=english[/url]
Stuff related to Alexander Dugin [url]http://www.arctogaia.com/public/eng/[/url]
Slavic National Unity(Slavic nationalism in general) [url]http://nationalism.org/slavic/[/url]
I'm not necessarily endorsing any of these parties nor stating I agree with everything these movements advocate.
2003-10-26 00:17 | User Profile
In point of fact many, if not most, of the parties listed are populist and not folkish. Some populist parties are able to provide some possitive results which can serve folkish needs in the long run (which is why I support such parties) while some like the Italy's National Alliance and Vlaam's Block are former nationalist parties that have chosen to embrace the neo-con concept of race and really don't deserve to be on the list at all. Many of the parties listed would never have anything to do with each other as they are so different in outlook. The question is when a party can used to serve folkish interests and what potion of one's time in such an instance should be invested with actions other then electoral.
2003-10-26 03:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=triskelion]In point of fact many, if not most, of the parties listed are populist and not folkish. Some populist parties are able to provide some possitive results which can serve folkish needs in the long run (which is why I support such parties) while some like the Italy's National Alliance and Vlaam's Block are former nationalist parties that have chosen to embrace the neo-con concept of race and really don't deserve to be on the list at all. Many of the parties listed would never have anything to do with each other as they are so different in outlook. The question is when a party can used to serve folkish interests and what potion of one's time in such an instance should be invested with actions other then electoral.[/QUOTE]
So you're saying that a party cannot be both Folkish and populist? :huh:
2003-10-26 04:41 | User Profile
Populist is simply a generalized term refering to parties that have generalized objection to the present high rates of dispossession of people within their nation by aliens rather then a systemic nationalist ideology. The term is used becuase those parties are often use "people" or "popular" in the title. Populist parties are not against multi-racialism per say but rather they want a signicant reduction in immegration although they don't favour segregation. Often times, they couch their opposition to the current rate of destruction of their nations in terms of the need to defend social democratic welfare states and the worst of them spend a great deal of time condemning "racism" and are openly in support of Zionism (like the Flemish VB). Many of them openly seek aliens and jews as members and have no real interest stoping decadence and moral decay (in Holland they open promote such things.
Some are less inclined towards such groveling then others and some populist parties have accually done some real good in slowing down the rate of national destruction. However, they are in way interested in creating a folkish community or fundimentally rejecting multi-racialim and as a result they have purpose to serve but are in way a solution to the long term problems facing Europa. Simply not supporting the worst that the current order has to offer or seeking to curtail the efffects of societal decline somewhat is not at all the same thing as being a genuine Eurocentric and containing a social pathology is not the same thing as seeking national renewal and a folkish state.
2003-10-26 05:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=triskelion]Populist is simply a generalized term refering to parties that have generalized objection to the present high rates of dispossession of people within their nation by aliens rather then a systemic nationalist ideology. The term is used becuase those parties are often use "people" or "popular" in the title. Populist parties are not against multi-racialism per say but rather they want a signicant reduction in immegration although they don't favour segregation. [/QUOTE]
No, actually populism is a political impulse that tries to base political movements on the grassroots and common people, as opposed to elitism which tries to base itself on the social/political elites. So in many ways, populism is folkish.
Franco used to have a good essay titled "Populism, Not Conservatism, Will Aid Future Nationalists" describing this on his website. But his website no longer works.
2003-10-26 07:07 | User Profile
What your saying is true within the American context but it is not true within the context of the European parties I am talking about. I am not talking about the term populist in some generic or American term but instead I am talking specifically about many of the parties listed in this thread as I had stated.
2003-10-26 17:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=triskelion]In point of fact many, if not most, of the parties listed are populist and not folkish. Some populist parties are able to provide some possitive results which can serve folkish needs in the long run (which is why I support such parties) while some like the Italy's National Alliance and Vlaam's Block are former nationalist parties that have chosen to embrace the neo-con concept of race and really don't deserve to be on the list at all. Many of the parties listed would never have anything to do with each other as they are so different in outlook. The question is when a party can used to serve folkish interests and what potion of one's time in such an instance should be invested with actions other then electoral.[/QUOTE]
A party exists only to get votes and therefore must think up new ways of getting elected. That is why folkish parties have taken the populist route, and that is also why I did not include in this list any of the National Socialist parties or WN parties which I feel have no chance at all at getting any votes. The NS movement even goes so far as to openly state that they exist only as a presence for propaganda, and because of this cannot be considered actual parties. However, with the exception of perhaps VB, all of the parties listed are fundamentally against multi-racialism. I suspect the comments by the VB leader is more of a scheme to get votes and doesn't actually reflect what he feels. Once parties become more popular they tend to become more moderate, yet if that is simply a scheme as to get control over the entire government is left to be seen. Once entire nations come under the control of these folkish parties then they can start to gradually educate the people and come out as more hardline folkish, but until then it is very frustrating to believe in a cause and remain marginalized.
2003-10-28 19:28 | User Profile
HSP (Croatian Party of the Rights) is our strongest far right party: [url]http://www.hsp.hr/osnovno/hsp_himna.htm[/url] During the latest war they contributed greatly to Croatian cause by establishing black shirt formation called HOS. Here you can download HSP anthem on MP3, the melody is borrowed from Ustasha march 'Puška puca a top riče' (Riffle strikes, cannon is roaring).
I am active member of HOP (Croatian Liberation Movement) founded by Ustasha Poglavnik in egsile. HOP is a direct successor of WW2. Ustasha movement and the only institution that survived Serbo-Slav Bolshevik occupation 1945. [url]http://www.hop.hr/[/url]
2003-10-28 19:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Zvaci]HSP (Croatian Party of the Rights) is our strongest far right party: [url]http://www.hsp.hr/osnovno/hsp_himna.htm[/url] [/QUOTE]
Do you have a link to their program or other material in English or other languages? I am sure many of us on this forum would like to read about them.
2003-10-28 19:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE][I]Mithras said:[/I] However, with the exception of perhaps VB, all of the parties listed are fundamentally against multi-racialism.[/QUOTE]
This is dead wrong. Scotand can't be multicultural enough to suit the SNP.
2003-10-28 20:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mithras]Do you have a link to their program or other material in English or other languages? I am sure many of us on this forum would like to read about them.[/QUOTE]
This is the best I could find at the moment: 'Nezavisna Država Hrvatska' - the official newspaper of HOP (English). I recomend 'Fokus' and 'Hrvatsko Slovo' also. [url]http://www.cdsp.neu.edu/info/students/marko/cropat.html[/url]
2003-10-29 17:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Uncle John]This is dead wrong. Scotand can't be multicultural enough to suit the SNP.[/QUOTE]
Noted. I don't care for the SNP either.