← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · il ragno
Thread ID: 10500 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2003-10-15
2003-10-15 12:25 | User Profile
I'm starting to think the ZioCons actually [B]want [/B] this slow bleeding & daily war of attrition in Iraq. Rather than being embarrassed by their inability to pacify Iraq into docility....or being prodded to rethink their commitment to Pax Judaica...they are [B]counting[/B] on the daily drip-drip-drip of guerilla actions killing US troops.
By this point, given the pendulum nature of US media coverage of any story, Iraq II is now at the point where the majority of column inches [I]should [/I] be pointing fingers and questioning the whole idea of the invasion. (Certainly, Bush has invoked God & Jesus enough by now to have tilted the Jew-directed coverage squarely against the Administration.) There ought to have been, by now, at least a steady IV drip of articles seeking to draw parallels to other invaded nations who have used guerilla tactics to repel an occupying force. (Although it is true that ALL such historical examples of resistance movements have been derided/dismissed of late...see the Free French. Now that the Jews have majority ownership in several military superpowers, there will apparently be no more countenancing of outmanned & outgunned patriots anywhere, in any cause.)
But it seems to me that if you view the skirmishes defining our occupation [I]through [/I] that prism of Jewish media, you (or at least I) start seeing a picture of Zionist media oligarchs patiently biding their time [I]waiting [/I] for an exploitable, photogenic atrocity a la [I]the Lebanon barracks [/I] with which to stoke Joe Foxnews' bloodlust high enough to be able to piggyback a wider war onto it.
If they can just leave our guys in harm's way long enough for an ambush of titanic proportions to cruelly snuff enough GIs, America- a country of wrestling fans who get their perspective on the world around them from Ken and Barbie dolls reading Jewish agitprop from teleprompters- will finally see that shade of red that lumps [I]all [/I] Arabs together in one subhuman metacategory requiring extermination....that makes us "all Israelis", to quote Netanyahu....thus giving our gutless leaders the poll-numbers Dutch courage to begin the all-out trampling of Iran, Syria and then onto Egypt and greater Arabia.
Like Sterling Hayden in DR STRANGELOVE, they will precipitate whatever conditions are necessary to ensure the atrocity that forces our hand into a posture of "total commitment". Certainly, at the rate we're going that atrocity is only a matter of [I]when [/I] and not [I]if [/I] now. I am further convinced of this when I note that, not only are all 11 thus-far-announced Presidential candidates unanimous in their stance on this war ([I]none[/I] are for immediate cessation and returning all troops to their families), but nearly 100% of them are either committed Christian Zionists or - to their sincere surprise - Jews of some sort who've only recently caught on to their part-tribal status.
In short, call me paranoid but - I don't see a short-sighted military strategy that is beginning to dissemble in the wake of what being an occupying force actually entails (although I [I]did [/I] think that not too long ago)....I've begun to see a deliberately mismanaged miltary strategy [I]designed [/I] to backfire as a necesary precursor to a heightened belligerence in the vox populi, behind whose momentum the entire Middle East can be gutted and scaled for the greater glory of Eretz Yisroel.
And all it will cost is the blood of American servicemen, deliberately used as pawns and cannon-fodder. By a hand-rubbing elite which is actively [I]depending [/I] on as much of that blood as possible being spilled.
2003-10-15 12:58 | User Profile
I donââ¬â¢t know Il Ragno, while nothing is beneath them your theory just doesnââ¬â¢t work for me. Sacrificing military blood to stir civilian blood didnââ¬â¢t work in Vietnam so Iââ¬â¢m not sure why the neo-cons would try it now. Remember that half the neos were red activists during the Vietnam era, an experience which should incline them towards the opposite of your suggestion.
Zionists arenââ¬â¢t very subtle in these matters, when they want dead goyim they go right ahead and kill them: the Liberty; the Lavon affair; possibly those American servicemen who were blown up in Palestine today. On the other hand dead goyim in engineered wars are merely a bonus.
2003-10-15 13:25 | User Profile
Yeah I know...it sounds tin-foily...still, it's just a feeling.
Vietnam was the first instance where the media came into a full awareness of the scope and breadth of their power in the electronic age. Suppose that awesome power was used to [I]buttress [/I] the warmongers' posirtion this time?
I mean, who is this generation's Walter Cronkite to tilt the country against military adventurism? Tony Snow? Tom Brokaw? Crazy-ass Dan Rather? I don't naively hold Cronkite on a pedestal...I'm just wondering why the current Big Money Media continues to quietly endorse a war waged by a buffoon who constantly refers to "the Lord" as his co-President (who demonstrably doesn't know or understand the area he is invading or its history), when previous to this they were quick to portray strictly-secular prior Administratrions as dens of lunatics and murderers.
Unless they all have their eyes on the prize of Greater Israel, and as such are willing to ignore things they'd be setting off alarms 24/7 about under other circumstances.
2003-10-15 13:33 | User Profile
The most powerful weapon the Arabs have against Israeli agression is demographics. Arabs outnumber Jews about 20 to 1 in the immediate area of Israel, an imbalance that could more than double in the next generation.
The national security of Israel is what comes first in Washington; no doubt our ZOG rulers are looking for a reason to carry out a systematic campaign of genocide against the Arab nations. The goal of these Zionist monsters is a greater Israel stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, built upon mounds of Christian and Muslim corpses, and Genghis W. Bush, the Zionist attack dog in the White House is just the man for the job..
-Z-
2003-10-15 17:25 | User Profile
Watch an entire platoon get wiped out soon by a missing "wmd" that Saddam has just "found" but shipped to Syria and gave "orders" through a Saudi Arabian to launch that baby from Lebanon into Iraq by an Egyptian military crew. Kaboom!!!! Red-State Joe and Sally Walmart scream to NUKE all the Ay-rabs and Fox News runs endless profiles on all those dead soldiers 24/7. Units of soldiers pull out and fall way back, away from the dead zone. B-52's are set forth and WWIII is begun. Sound crazy?
2003-10-15 18:12 | User Profile
Damn it Il Ragno, you're getting me paranoid. I keep coming up with reasons why you're wrong, and then I see that you still have a point.
Some neocons do want to take over the whole Middle East. They are no doubt biding their time for just such a disaster as you foresee. And they would tell W that it could be done on the cheap, and he would believe them. And when it turned out to be far more costly than they said, including a return to the draft, they'd use the media to whip up the lemmings into a patriotic frenzy.
After all, except for the draft, that's just what they did in Afghanistan and Iraq.