← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Bardamu
Thread ID: 10423 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2003-10-11
2003-10-11 14:22 | User Profile
Here is an interesting website:
[url]http://www.city-data.com/[/url]
2003-10-11 16:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Bardamu]Here is an interesting website:
[url]http://www.city-data.com/[/url][/QUOTE]
Thanks for the link.
I was born and raised just south of Houston, which is now about 31% White. When I was a child, I'm guessing Houston was at least 60% White. I live in Denver, now about 51% White. I'm sure Denver will soon drop under 50%, if it hasen't already.
Enkidu
2003-10-11 20:19 | User Profile
One concept the liberals have started harping on is "social capitol". Yes, I have actually found one article written by a liberal and possible Chosen One, about how in her NYC neighborhood filled with the fruits of diversity (people imported from Africa and God-knows-where) she was unable to to get anyone together to turn a local vacant lot and informal dump into a small park for the kids, even though the new imports were enthusiastic breeders and had lots of kids. Having social capitol is the opposite of this, having social capitol means you can talk to your neighbors, join together in common tasks/causes, and actually not live in fear of being killed by the,. Social capitol is what you have, what we all had, in all-White neighborhoods. The actual subject of the article was social capitol and the lack thereof.
I live in Silicon Valley myself and will not rest until it's the white, bright place that produced luminaries like William Shockley again. I'm smart enough to smile etc at the brown/black invaders living around here, so I don't get reported, but I'm waiting cos itz coming. This place is overrun with invaders from India plus some loud smelly black bucks to liven up the mix. The few other whites around here look disoriented and doomed. Welcome to Weimar America.........
2003-10-11 20:29 | User Profile
Acorn,
that's a pretty funny description of the place. You mentioned the dot-heads, but don't forget the sneaky geeky one-another-favoring chinks though. Dot-heads' children are pretty dumb due to the regression to the mean. The chinks, however, are smarter, and given their cultural tendencies to dedicate a lot of effort to studying and preparing for tests, to cheat and always prefer other chinks to roundeyes, they are much more dangerous.
2003-10-11 20:37 | User Profile
Enkidu,
I grew up in Des Moines. It is still White at 78%. When I was growing up it was probably 98%. Diversity meant blondes, brunettes, and redheads.
2003-10-11 20:49 | User Profile
Don't worry folks I may be a n00b but if you've been reading my posts you'll know I have my square White head screwed on right. They're ALL the enemy. This is just a matter of scientific fact, competition between species, or sub-species for survival. You just have to ask why the scientific community hasn't raised us from childhood knowing these simple laws; at least during one enlightened period in Germany kids were taught their Rassenkünde. They'd fought off the parasite!
2003-10-11 21:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Bardamu]Enkidu,
I grew up in Des Moines. It is still White at 78%. When I was growing up it was probably 98%. Diversity meant blondes, brunettes, and redheads.[/QUOTE]
I don't know the age of these stats, but I looked up a very small town in NE where one side of the family resides. Suffice it to say, the stats are COMPLETELY BS.
Half the school system is now mestizo. The town is listed as 90%+ white.