← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Recluse
Thread ID: 10393 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2003-10-10
2003-10-10 10:02 | User Profile
Here's a sample:
To: quidnunc
You are on target.
Jews were promoting monotheism, education and business for centuries IN EUROPE while most of their original eurotrash neighbors were worshipping trees and humping rocks.
3 posted on 10/08/2003 6:23 PM PDT by Yehuda ([url]http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com[/url]) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]
[url]http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/997784/posts[/url]
2003-10-12 08:11 | User Profile
Well at least 'euro-trash' do not become [B]snip-dicks[/B]
2003-10-12 08:38 | User Profile
LOL should I register there and post the Hamas Tours pic?
2003-10-12 13:29 | User Profile
Liberty Forum's Hoplophile had some comments about jewish monotheism and the circumcision ritual. I thought his statement that ancient Hebrew was "Koko-speak", as in "Koko want banana" or "Hymie want bagel", was hilarious. Here it is:
We tend to attribute a lot more sophistication to the ancient Hebrews than they deserve. For example:
Ancient Hebrew, the language of the Torah (Old Testament) and the book on which these laws Scalia wants to study are based, is a far more primitive language than the Greek of the New Testament.
Ancient Hebrew has no tenses. It's a little like ebonics in that "he do that" could mean that he did it, that he's doing it, or that he will do it. Context must be looked at to be able to guess what tense is being used.
There is no "is" in ancient Hebrew. They talked in Koko speak. "Banana good." "Ruth woman." "Me Hopie."
Ancient Hebrew has a 30,000 word vocabulary. The English language has over 300,000 words -- and all the verbs have tenses. Many of the Hebrew words are open to various interpretations. Hebrew scholars are divided on what much of the Old Testament actually says. God is alternately referred to in the singular and the plural. Nonetheless, Jews claim to have given us the one God concept. Let's just ignore Zarathustra. One also has to wonder why God chose a people with a limited vocabulary to transmit his divine message. The Old Testament ought perhaps to be translated literally so that we can appreciate the Koko speak nuances and interpret for ourselves.
This pillaging primitive tribe of Arabs (Semites) who raped, looted and plundered are not accepted by other Arabs. Why? Because God loves them for being special. God loves them so much they form a Covenant with God. As a sign of that special bond, all the males mutilate their penises in the rite called circumcision. Abram (aka Abraham) mutilates himself when he's about 90. The practice then becomes mutilation at day eight. God wants this. Or, the gods want this -- depending on the flip flop Hebrew of the time. This primitive African penis mutilation rite then becomes central to the religion, as important according to the Talmud as any of the Commandments. We are told by some modern doctors this is a health issue, that a circumcised or mutilated penis is a healthy penis. This is contrary to Darwinian laws of evolution. The fact is children die during circumcision. The Talmud and the Kitzur Schuchan Aruch aknowledge that. It is also a fact that many children have lost their reproductive capabilities through penis mutilation, and that the practice of the mohel sucking on the circumcised baby's penis has been responsible for giving venereal diseases to many eight day old babies.
[url]http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_philosophy&Number=313838&page=&view=&sb=&o=&part=all&vc=1&t=0[/url]
From the same thread:
Jewish law and Jewish religion are inseparable. "Looking for Loopholes" might be a good alternate title to the Jewish holy books. We've all heard the Talmudic (Baba Mezia 59b) story where a rabbi debates God and wins the debate. God admits losing. That story illustrates three things: 1) Talmudic Jews have an inflated sense of self worth. 2) They love looking for loopholes to exploit. 3) Whatever they are worshipping is not God if a rabbi can win a debate with "It."
Kitzer Schulchan (Shulchan Aruch) -- The Code of Jewish Law On-line and Abbreviated
There are laws on the proper way to get dressed: "When dressing ourselves, we must always give preference to the right hand or foot over the left; but when removing shoes and other articles of apparel, the left comes first. With regard to fastening a lace, the left should be given precedence, because the tefillin are fastened on the left hand. Any knot, therefore, should be made on the left side first. When our shoes have laces, we first put the shoe on the right foot without lacing it, then we put the one on the left and lace it, and afterward we lace the one on the right. This method of dressing also applies to all other articles of clothing."
There are laws on how to dress and how to walk, and where not to walk. "A man should be careful not to pass between two women, two dogs, or two swine. Nor should two men permit a woman, a dog, or a swine to pass between them." {This shows the high regard Orthodox Jews have for dogs and swine -- that they would group them with women.}
There are laws on hand washing, both ritual hand washing and washing before meals. There are special washing rules for days like Yom Kippur ("Only washing for pleasure is forbidden on Yom Kippur; but even when permissible, one should be very careful not to wash more than it is actually necessary.") Before meals: "We first wash our right hand and then our left. The water must cover the entire hand up to the wrist. No part of the hands should be left unwashed; therefore, the fingers must be slightly parted, and raised somewhat upward, in order that the water may run down the entire length of the fingers. It must also cover the finger tips and the full circumference of the fingers. The entire hand should be covered with one outpouring of water."
There are laws on when food becomes impure through contact with Gentiles.
I have an entire book filled with the laws on meat and milk, which two items are forbidden to be eaten together. It discusses how long should one wait after ingesting one before it is proper to ingest the other, and how much separation should there be between storage vessels, etc.
There are multiple laws on how to pee: "When one urinates while standing, one should take care not to splash any urine on one's shoes or clothes, and one should be extremely careful not to hold the membrum." (Holding the membrum might make it easier not to pee on one's shoe, but the theory is this would create sexual excitement. Those horny Jews.)
There are laws on how and when to poop: A person should accustom himself to respond to the call of nature once in the evening and once in the morning; such a habit is conducive to alertness and cleanliness. If he is unable to ease himself, he should walk a distance of four cubits (six feet), repeating it several times if need be; or he should divert his attention from other matters. He who defers easing himself, is guilty of violating a biblical command (Leviticus 11:43):"
There are laws on how to wipe. I have this tape where a Rabbi discusses the problem of accidentally penetrating one's self with a finger while wiping. How does that happen?
There are Rabbinical discussions on whether it is proper to tear toilet paper on the Sabbath (Shabbat). Orthodox Jews pre-tear paper for Shabbat. Should they forget, there is a problem. Tearing at the perforations is not allowed since this is considered further manufacture. The paper may be torn with the teeth at a place where there are no perforations, or one may wipe using the roll without tearing and hope the flush tears the paper. This is deeply mystical stuff that is being discussed. Just remember Yahweh cares about these things.
There are laws on farting: ""If one had let wind, one is forbidden to utter anything holy until bad odor had ceased; the same applies to a case where the bad odor had issued from his neighbor. But if one is engaged in the study of the Torah, one need not interrupt his study on account of a bad odor that had issued from his neighbor."
The Talmud has four different methods of capital punishment.
The folks who made up these laws are the light of the world. Orthodox Judaism puts Confucianism or Buddhism to shame.
2003-10-12 23:02 | User Profile
One also has to wonder why God chose a people with a limited vocabulary to transmit his divine message.
Plausible deniability?
2003-10-13 06:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Jews were promoting monotheism, education and business for centuries IN EUROPE while most of their original eurotrash neighbors were worshipping trees and humping rocks.[/QUOTE]
Well, subjectively speaking, I agree that 99% of Whites are Euro-trash. I am more facinated with the 1% of White intellectuals; the rest I find useless.
Conservative
2003-10-13 09:34 | User Profile
[QUOTE=MadScienceType]Plausible deniability?[/QUOTE]
Actually, His first choice was the French - that'll cause some involuntary tics over in FReeperland - but they begged off and that made Him furious, so He decided to punish everybody - there's that collective quilt thing again - and...well, you know the rest.
2003-10-13 09:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=wintermute]Good one, MST. I'm going to be laughing about that all week.
Recluse, those hoplophile reposts are fantastic! He needs to work all that stuff together into an essay. I don't monitor LF, so if he pulls something else that interesting out of his hat, please reprint it here.
Wintermute[/QUOTE]
He hasn't posted in a while. I think the thuggish tactics of the Zionists over there got to him. Here's a list of his posts:
[url]http://www.libertyforum.org/dosearch.php?Cat=&Forum=All_Forums&Words=hoplophile&Match=Username&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts[/url]
2003-10-23 20:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Conservative]Well, subjectively speaking, I agree that 99% of Whites are Euro-trash. I am more facinated with the 1% of White intellectuals; the rest I find useless.
Conservative[/QUOTE]
More anti Occidental dribble from the ever banal Ares who now mislabels his hatred of my race and his Heaven's Gate weirdness as conservative. In any case, his inability to distinguish between scientific empiricism and sci-fi fantasy has proven he lacks the ability understand what ever intellectuals he claims to be fascinated with while his blather about wanting to be kidnaped by aliens and what ââ¬Åtrans-humanââ¬Â technology space aliens may have shows his grasp on sanity is at best tenuous .
2003-10-23 20:58 | User Profile
In fairness to the establishment (I don't often say this), many gentile liberals regard the JDL and the Kahanites as "hate groups" and their websites as "hate sites." There comes a point where even a good Clintonite cuts his losses when encountering calls to genocide and websites devoted to the subhuman status of non-Jews.
True enough, AY. One thing I can say for the true-believer variety of anti-racialist liberals is that at least they are consistent enough to call a spade a spade (no pun intended), finding Jewish supremacism just as abhorrent as White supremacism (though they do seem to have a curious blind spot where Blacks are concerned).
I guess the meat of the matter is that most of them haven't heard of the JDL and Kahanites, since none of those are the subjects of breathless prime-time Big Three network and HBO cable specials devoted to exposing "hate" and rooting it out. We all know why that is, of course, so perhaps correcting this discrepancy could be a side project for any budding WN media. Of course, to be effective, the hypothetical media would have to be an neutral-appearing offshoot and have no obvious ties to WN ideology, lest the message be killed along with the messenger.
Keeping this in mind, it is supremely ironic that years ago Jim Robinson feared his site would be given "hate site" status for Buchanan-style mild anti-Zionism and anti-immigrationism. In purging these elements, JR has created a haven for the most rabid and bloodthirsty Kahanite Zionists, and nothing would please me more than seeing the same "hate site" label he so dreaded justifiably pinned on him for it.
Then again, he and his fellow political Judas Escariots might take it as a badge of honor at this point.
Call me a cynic, but JimRob and the whole of FR is only going to avoid the scarlet "H" so long as he's useful to the Jews. The second that's at an end, I'm sure he'll find himself in good company with the likes of Duke, Pierce, Metzger, Butler et al. wondering how the heck he ended up lumped in with those crazy "haters." I too would relish the sight.