← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · FadeTheButcher
Thread ID: 10256 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2003-10-05
2003-10-05 06:16 | User Profile
Yes, segregation works. More Negroes are locked up in prison than ever before. Unfortunately, the costs of violent crime are simply being transfered from individuals onto taxpayers as a whole which is busting us fiscally. Yes the crime rate is down, but why? The answer is that whites are busting their ass to get away from Negros and Hispanics, fleeing into the suburbs if not out of entire states. Gated communities, home security systems, and tougher sentancing laws make a difference.
[url]http://www.washingtontimes.com/specialreport/20031005-120017-7049r.htm[/url]
Murder in America has fallen into a historic slump, and that's a fact more people can live with. Murder rates have dropped to levels not seen since the mid-1960s, punctuating the end of a bloody 20th century where more than twice as many died in American homicides as U.S. troops did in wars.
"No one has a good theory that explains the drop," says David Baldus, a University of Iowa law school professor and recognized expert on murder prosecutions. . .
2003-10-05 06:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=FadeTheButcher]Yes, segregation works. More Negroes are locked up in prison than ever before. Unfortunately, the costs of violent crime are simply being transfered from individuals onto taxpayers as a whole which is busting us fiscally. Yes the crime rate is down, but why? The answer is that whites are busting their ass to get away from Negros and Hispanics, fleeing into the suburbs if not out of entire states. Gated communities, home security systems, and tougher sentancing laws make a difference.
[url]http://www.washingtontimes.com/specialreport/20031005-120017-7049r.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
There was a study done a couple of years ago by a Stanford (Inner Party) professor that purported to prove that Roe v. Wade (1973) was directly responsible for a sharp decline in young black males in the 1990's resulting in a sharp decrease in violent crime.
I wonder if that's true.
Walter
2003-10-05 06:45 | User Profile
Yes, that is another factor I forgot to mention. Imagine how far it would drop if we sterilized every one of them or forced them to leave the country.
2003-10-05 07:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=wintermute]I believe "radioactive" is the scientific term for studies of this kind. Wintermute[/QUOTE]
Radioactive, indeed.
It was covered, however. I recall reading a full page review of it in that consummate establishment rag, Business Week (which I've been reading for ages). And not only there, either. It's as if the information is laid out there for the decision makers, who understand by some invisible radar that they're not supposed to discuss it in public.
Another "radioactive" book that BW covered was called "Bowling Alone." This was was based on very reputable studies that proved that the atomization of American society (the so-called "loss of social capital" or the "bowling alone" pheonomenon) is caused essentially by rising ethnic "diversity."
Another really explosive set of studies that are mentioned for the record but never discussed publicly is the work done modeling computer societies published in the Atlantic Monthly (another rag I regularly read). Yggdrasil mentions this article on his site. If you haven't read it, I strongly urge you to do so:
[url]http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/04/rauch.htm[/url]
Here's verified scientific proof - for anyone interested - that a multi-ethnic state is an impossibility, that segregation is an unavoidable fact of nature, and that given enough time, genocide is a natural phenomenon that will always arise in multi-ethnic societies. I bought the book that this article was based on - all the authors were of course IP.
(Actually, come to think of it, this computer modeling stuff is solid proof of the inevitablity of the "bowling alone" phenomenon described above. Now we know why.)
The thing that kills me about it is that our elites KNOW all of this. They publish it their rags, just so they all know it and can reference it when they discuss it among themselves. Of course, they don't allow anybody else to talk about the obvious implications of this work - especially that "diversity" is nothing to "celebrate."
It really is like the Bell Curve, as you mention, which was clearly written by and for Jews. The word was passed, all else are required to shut up about it.
And we let them get away with it.
Walter
2003-10-05 12:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE]I think the general consensus is yes. No one found major methodological flaws in the study, and the drop in violent crime followed, on a state by state basis, the vanished demographic cohort. States that legalized abortion first (or began aborting on a large scale first) expericed the drop first. As I recall, the effect was quite marked.[/QUOTE]
You know, only blacks surpass us in their love for the IP lash.
I mean, here you have the IP bloody CROWING about how Roe v. Wade is really cool because it slaughtered millions of innocent black boys (including cutting their fully-formed heads open with a scalpel while they're alive, sucking out their brains with a vacuum cleaner, crushing their skulls with stainless steel jaws, and then dismembering and removing them from their mothers' wombs in pieces) - because they didn't get a chance to grow up and commit a crime.
Hey, absolute numbers of murdered black baby boys must have passed the portent "six million" mark long ago.
Not only is there nary a peep about this naked genocide, but Black ministers like Jesse Jackson support it wholeheartedly. And blacks vote 90% Democrat - which is the central organ of world IP power - in election after election after election.
Blacks monolithically vote for those who celebrate their genocide.
Black and white Americans truly are brothers - kindred spirits in self-destructive stupidity. A sort of salt and pepper version of Dumb and Dumber.
Kminta - where art thou?
Walter
2003-10-05 14:15 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]... It really is like the Bell Curve, as you mention, which was clearly written by and for Jews. The word was passed, all else are required to shut up about it.
And we let them get away with it.
[/QUOTE]
Walter,
The Bell Curve was co-authored by Hernstein and Murray, of whom KMacD says the following [[URL=http://www.grecoreport.com/the_culture_of_critique.htm]CofC preface[/URL]]: [QUOTE]Interestingly, in the case of one of those I mention, Richard J. Hernstein, Alan Ryan (1994, 11) writes, "Hernstein essentially wants the world in which clever Jewish kids or their equivalent make their way out of their humble backgrounds and end up running Goldman Sachs or the Harvard physics department." This is a stance that is typical, I suppose, of neo-conservatism, a Jewish movement I discuss in several places, and it is the sort of thing that, if true, would suggest that Hernstein did perceive the issues discussed in The Bell Curve as affecting Jewish interests in a way that Charles Murray, his co-author, did not. (Ryan contrasts Murray's and Hernstein's world views: "Murray wants the Midwest in which he grew up -- a world in which the local mechanic didn't care two cents whether he was or wasn't brighter than the local math teacher.") [/QUOTE]
2003-10-05 14:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Roe v. Wade is really cool because it slaughtered millions of innocent black boys because they didn't get a chance to grow up and commit a crime. Not only is there nary a peep about this naked genocide, but Black ministers like Jesse Jackson support it wholeheartedly.[/QUOTE]
Beggars can't be choosers; if Congress was devoutly Roman Catholic, we'd all have six locks on our doors and a few of us here would already be dead.
As far as I'm concerned, winning ugly is still a win.
2003-10-05 15:55 | User Profile
I hope I do not sound sadistically harsh and cruel, but every Black child NOT carried to birth is a gift from God to the White race.
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]You know, only blacks surpass us in their love for the IP lash.
I mean, here you have the IP bloody CROWING about how Roe v. Wade is really cool because it slaughtered millions of innocent black boys (including cutting their fully-formed heads open with a scalpel while they're alive, sucking out their brains with a vacuum cleaner, crushing their skulls with stainless steel jaws, and then dismembering and removing them from their mothers' wombs in pieces) - because they didn't get a chance to grow up and commit a crime.
Hey, absolute numbers of murdered black baby boys must have passed the portent "six million" mark long ago.
Not only is there nary a peep about this naked genocide, but Black ministers like Jesse Jackson support it wholeheartedly. And blacks vote 90% Democrat - which is the central organ of world IP power - in election after election after election.
Blacks monolithically vote for those who celebrate their genocide.
Black and white Americans truly are brothers - kindred spirits in self-destructive stupidity. A sort of salt and pepper version of Dumb and Dumber.
Kminta - where art thou?
Walter[/QUOTE]
2003-10-05 16:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Leveller]Walter,
The Bell Curve was co-authored by Hernstein and Murray, of whom KMacD says the following [[URL=http://www.grecoreport.com/the_culture_of_critique.htm]CofC preface[/URL]]:[/QUOTE]
Umm . . Charles Murray is Jewish, isn't he?
Walter
2003-10-05 16:28 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Aiwaz93]I hope I do not sound sadistically harsh and cruel, but every Black child NOT carried to birth is a gift from God to the White race.[/QUOTE]
Why, yes, in fact you do sound sadistically harsh and cruel.
Hey, I don't hate blacks. I believe they should live in Africa - or at least far away from us. Out of sight, out of mind.
But killing black babies?
That's what you're saying.
No good man could have anything but contempt for it.
Warmest regards,
Walter
2003-10-05 17:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Umm . . Charles Murray is Jewish, isn't he?
Walter[/QUOTE]
I don't think he is.
2003-10-05 18:30 | User Profile
We live in a hard World - the only morality nature recognises is the morality of survival. Ideally I would like to see geographical segreagation of the races, resettlement of Americas Negroes perhaps in the prsent territory of Guyana, to be done fairly and peacefully as humanly possible together with a sustantial goodwill payment to the Negroes (contingent on a perpetual reliquishment of US rights).This is my honest and hearfelt position that I have maintained for years.Anything else is mere tinkering. BUT as things stand at present, with the rotten and corrupted US political system, this wilkl never hapen.As other correspondents have remarked a defacto segregation, based on the US prison system has evolved of late (at enormous expense), taking the edge of the worst excesses of Negro brutality from the general population. I bear no malice to the Negro, but we must face the fact that they are a danger to the White race, a growing danger that threatens more year by year. Great White Sharks, rattlesnakes, hyenas, Grey Wolves are all God's creatures containing in their beings a spark of the divine, they are the fruit of countless millenia of evolution, Why do we have the right to say they should not have the right to exist? are we not the usurpers upon their territory? No we realise that these creatures are a danger to us, they kill us.We kill them in the name of OUR right to live.That in the end is only morality.
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Why, yes, in fact you do sound sadistically harsh and cruel.
Hey, I don't hate blacks. I believe they should live in Africa - or at least far away from us. Out of sight, out of mind.
But killing black babies?
That's what you're saying.
No good man could have anything but contempt for it.
Warmest regards,
Walter[/QUOTE]