← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Bardamu
Thread ID: 10237 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2003-10-04
2003-10-04 15:53 | User Profile
L'Affair Limbaugh
by Alex Linder
Loaded: 10/3/2003
[url]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn/showEssay.asp?essayID=1710[/url]
Start with the context. Rush Limbaugh is America's #1 radio host, a political commentator with sports-marketing background, a slavish Zionist, and the husband of jew. This diamond among zircons was hired by jew-owned ESPN, which is a subsidiary of jew-owned ABC, which is a subsidiary of jew-owned Disney -- the second-biggest media conglomerate in the world -- to offer some tidbits of analysis of NFL games, in hopes that his big name would draw market share. The NFL is led by a jewish commissioner, Paul Tagliabue, and the vast majority of its players are black. A couple weeks into the season, Limbaugh made one true, shallow comment about media framing a story related to race, then apologized and resigned his position, following the predictably ensuing media-generated "controversy." In order to placate non-whites and restore calm to the universe, he withdrew to his politically safe day job as cheerleader for jewish wars of aggression in Southwestern Asia. Over and out.
That's what happened. Thatz the big picture. Now letz look at the 'tailz.
Let's start by looking at the way jews and blacks and Whites intersect with regard to politics, media, and sports. We know from history that jews singlehandedly created the NAACP and the anti-White movement, and that they did this to advance their own group interest in eradicating traditional, European-Christian America. The history of jews creating and organizing black hate to destroy White communities is as undeniable as it is suppressed. To cover their tracks and make actions that would otherwise have seemed hateful and vindictive palatable to normal Americans, the jews ceaselessly promoted to the white masses the false ideologies of human equality and cultural pluralism and white guilt. The jews claimed that race did not exist, that the white race was guilty, that every human difference was a product of culture, and that all cultures were equal, that diversity was our greatest strength, and that America was conceived by the Founders as a place for these different cultures to coexist. All these claims were lies, but as the jews gained power in academia, they spread. And as the jews bought up the major media -- newspapers in the '20s, radio in the '30s, and tv in the '50s -- they stuck. Moreover, the jews were able to suppress alternative views. Nobody who disagreed with the jew-set line could get his word out to the masses. And the few who did -- Henry Ford, Father Coughlin, Charles Lindbergh -- were turned on as one by the jewish hate machine until by one means or another they were forced into silence. Thus did the majority opinion, the democractic opinion -- the opinion of the people -- give way to the minority opinion -- the opinion of the real but hidden rulers of the country. If you control the media, you control the masses. That is what the history of the U.S. in the 20th century proves, above all else. Since at least the 1920s, the jews have controlled the media in the United States of America.
It is worth interjecting here that this black-superiority movement was pushed in the name of equality and "civil rights," and that itz triumph was complete only when, in the mid-sixties, it completely eradicated the free association that is the be-all of genuine civil rights, and then when it further succeeded in the early seventies in imposing anti-White quotas across all government and most business. This policy of calling a ragweed a rose is a long and venerable tradition among the jews, a people whom the philosopher Schopenhauer called the "great masters of the lie." We will see below how this figures into the Limbaugh comments and the jewsmedia reaction.
Where did sports fit into this political struggle? Well, if you're promoting the lie that an inferior race isn't, it would be wise to find whatever genuine areas of superiority the inferior race possesses, and promote them around the clock, because you're going to have to do an awful lot of cover-up in suppressing the much greater number of areas in which they're inferior. Blacks have genuine abilities in music, and superior abilities in sports requiring speed. Thus, these capacities for entertainment and athletics were emphasized out of all proportion to their merits by the jews producing the mass media. Slowly but surely the jews used their control over the airwaves to promote mass sports and break down color barriers. Slowly pro sports began to develop a mass following, and slowly minorities began to enter the professional leagues. They performed well. As the decades passed, they began to dominate. The jews promoted the minorities every step of the way, constantly looking for new openings to exploit. It was a step-by-step, degree-by-degree process, very much parallel to the way they normalized deviant sexuality through their movies and tv dramas. Whatever broke down traditional, stable White America and made it more digestible to jews was what appeared on the screen, big or small. They began to rewrite the history of White sports -- all major sports were created by Whites -- much the way they rewrote the history of the White nation: they focused on the exclusion of the minority as the defining essence of the "bad old days," and the breaking of the color barrier as the defining social-historical meaning of the game's evolution. Only in some sports could jews rationally get away with their ewige storyline: the White man holding back the colored -- because only in certain sports was it true. No "affirmative action" or other euphemism was needed for coloreds to succeed in basketball or baseball or football, merely opportunity. The jews knew this, and they knew that Whites knew it, and they rubbed this in continually, even as they denied whites their legitimate superiorities in every other field of human activity. Instead of conceding that whereas blacks can jump high and dunk basketballs, Whites can build civilizations, the jews used blacks' success in basketball as backing for their false claim that the only reason blacks hadn't succeeded in every other sphere was that they had been denied opportunity. The jews knew they were lying. They also knew that their argument would be plausible to millions and millions of whites, not least because, by the eighties at least, all these whites did in their non-tax-slave hours was sit around and watch negroes perform on jewish television, rather than read books that might acquaint them with real history and real facts about race.
Thus, at the time of Limbaugh's comments in 2003, we see that the jews had taken political control from Whites through the expert use of television, a mass-indoctrination tool of historically unprecedented power. We see that they had used this control to lie to whites about their own history, and to lull them into paying tens or hundreds a month for the privilege of worshipping negroes on the dullmaker in the one activity in which negroes shine. And we see that from this single example they constructed the ignoble lie that save for white racism blacks would have advanced as far or farther than whites in every other activity. I can't pinpoint the exact date, but certainly by the eighties it was already too late to speak the truth about race anywhere but in private, and certainly nothing true about race could be broadcast over tv, whether in sports or anything else. The triumph of the jews seemed complete. Into this environment strode Rush Limbaugh.
Before getting to Rush's comments, let me point out that Jews were, are, and will remain ideological dope dealers smart enough not to smoke their own stash. They sell equality heroin to you, but they never inject it themselves. They stick to their hateful race-cult business that has seen them through the last five thousand years. The jews don't allow anybody into their homeland who isn't a jew, and they define jew by blood. Has nothing to do with what you believe. Itz one standard for you the white whose community must be racially integrated -- the jeuphemism for destroyed -- and another for the jew who wishes to preserve his blood and race intact, certainly without any heroic negro ekwalz messing it up. There are no blacks in Israel, save a few Ethiopians of dubious status. The only affirmative actions there are the hundreds of laws discriminating against the Arab minority in the ways that were called racist and morally evil when whites used them to protect their neighborhoods in America or Europe. It cannot be overemphasized that what the jews hold out as good for you and yours is most certainly the opposite of what is good for them and theirs. Everything a jew says must be translated from English into "good for jews" before it can be safely understood.
From what we've discussed, it is clear that race-in-sports is seen by the controlling jews as one battle sector along the eternal racial warfront that is politics. The jews are interested in any group of non-jews only to the extent it advances the jewish agenda. If promoting White athletes, or Asians, advanced their agenda, they'd flip on a dime. But that will not happen.
The jews controlling the media treat race in sports the same way they treat it in politics and every other sphere: black good, white bad. Any point on the globe two whites come together is a racist enclave that must be broken up, reckoning by jewish paranoia. Understand that, and you have true north when trying to find your way back to the policy jews advocate. Jews have the right to exclude anyone or join anyone. Goys have the right to be open to jewish inspection anywhere, anytime. Don't like it? You're an anti-Semite, the jews' word for non-jews. Any place or position traditionally held by whites must be broken up. Jews made the destruction of free association the centerpiece of their "civil rights" campaign because if you can't legally band with others of like mind and exclude others -- the essence of free association -- then it is nearly impossible to develop groups that can fight back against jewish oppression. This may seem a tad afield from sports, but it isn't. You just have to channel the jew spirit, and you can grasp where they're coming from and what they will do, and why the personal is the political -- and the athletic, too. If whites have always been quarterback, then that in itself is reason they shouldn't be. The quarterback is the figurative head of the team, as is the coach. If the heads are all white, that negates the advantage of colorized sports because it supports the claims of the racists that black QBs lack the necessities -- brains and judgments -- to play QB or to manage. Which in turn negates the advantage of having masses of couch potatoes spectating blacks, if they are only appear as foot soldiers under the marshal's command. Football is the most popular sport, remember. Thus, when Limbaugh says
I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. "The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve.
he is certainly correct. The media promote Tiger Woods because they want more black golfers, and promote the Williams sisters because they want more coloreds in tennis. They want more black QBs, and so they relentlessly promote McNabb, and the mediocre Kordell Stewart -- "Slash," you know, hot, like an action figure -- and Michael Vick, and every other black QB who might become a poster boy for the future they envision, in which White-dominated positions go the way of California. Not just that, they overtly and repeatedly and expressly reiterate the hope/claim/demand/law that the position of QB is/must changing/be changed to favor traditional black superiorities -- speed -- thereby downgrading the intelligence and judgment that, jew lies notwithstanding, continue to define the successful quarterback. As always -- as with Marx and Freud -- the jews conceal their ethnic hate theories as objective observations. They want to destroy whites. They want to destroy white sports. They want to destroy white football. They want to destroy white quarterbacks. How do they do that? The position, like the 'Kwa itself, is changing. No longer about thinking. About running fast. Is it so? No. Then we'll keep harping until it is. We'll keep insisting the rules be changed to make the quarterback harder to tackle, thereby aiding the quicker black. We'll keep stiffening the rules against cornerbacks and safeties to make it harder to cover receivers, making it likelier that passes will be caught or result in penalties, making it easier to play quarterback, reducing the need for quick, accurate judgments, opening the door to lower-IQ'd black quarterbacks in line with our political position, I mean objective observations. Don't think it works that way? Read Cuddihy on Marx. Read Cuddihy on Freud. Read MacDonald on all these and more. The parallel to blacks as quarterbacks tracks exactly with their observations. All history is the history of class struggle. All quarterback history is the story of racist whites holding down naturally able blacks. The golden future of classless society is inevitable. The nature of the QB position is inevitably changing to one that favors black abilities over white. Limbaugh merely hinted at this, and the media went hog wild, abusing him viciously. The jew always misrepresents the past and the present in order to **** up the future. Always. In every single arena in which his media operate, whether American football or war in Iraq, we see the same pattern of jew-interested lies. And the same pattern of shoot-the-messenger when those lies are revealed.
Yes, exactly as in the political sphere, where the jew lies about history, even as he lies about present-day reality, even as he misrepresents possibilities for the future, even as he works to undercut with the most vicious smears and legal intercessions anybody who opposes him, here he lies about the nature of the quarterback, his treatment of the quarterback, and the character and intentions of anybody who points out his counterfactual framing of reality. What not one cock-eyed jew at ESPN can deny is that the channel of Cohns, Levys, Bermans and Bornsteins would never, ever, ever run a program pointing out that whites succeed at QB with greater frequency than blacks because whites have genetically higher IQ and superior judgment, and that these advantages have in the past and will in the future continue to outweigh negroes' superior footspeed. But the channel would have no problem running a show that agreed that blacks in fact do possess superior speed due to their West African genetic heritage. No matter how cool ESPN appears...the truth it fears. And thatz a jewish tradition you can bank on. The truth is not in the jew, for the jew is the father of lies.
There are subtler points. For instance, the media talk about how many blacks are encouraged by coaches to become backs or receivers rather than QBs; how many potential black QBs are lost that way. The media never mention that perhaps the discouragement actually works this way: perhaps whites who can run and jump are discouraged from becoming running backs and receivers, because everybody knows, as one jewish production put it, "White men can't jump." Perhaps young white males have athletic anorexia due to low self-esteem brought on by hate messages ubiquitous in the jewish media. Or maybe I missed the sequel, "Black Men Can't Think." I don't recall it was ever released. A white might ask, how many whites are denied broadcasting positions or coaching slots because of ESPN campaigns to ensure that unqualified minorities are given first dibs? Who knows? Why do I, the White viewer, have to put up with not seeing myself reflected on a field or court that is 80% black, nor hear myself reflected from a booth that is 50% jewish? Only a "hater" would pose the question. Ever seen a jew described as a hater? Me either. Is it me, or are jews framing everything to their own advantage, and dragging out the nastiest slurs in the book to attack anybody who objects?
We do know that most certainly ESPN, the sports leader worldwide, as it styles itself, probably has fewer white broadcasters and anchors than jews. I can guarantee you if you go through the on-air talent at ESPN you will find that women, blacks, and jews are overrepresented in comparison to white males. There are very few white males who ever make it on air at ESPN who aren't there only because they used to be professional athletes. If even one in a hundred negroes could speak understandable English, there'd be fewer of these. A perfect example of affirmative action in broadcasting is baseball analyst Harold Reynolds. He simply cannot speak English, even after years of working for ESPN. No white man, even if he were an ex-athlete like Reynolds, so weak at enunciation would ever be considered for that position, let alone hired. Note that, just as in the Ivy Leagues, the on-air slots for negroes and mexicans and women come at the expense of non-jewish White males -- never at the expense of jews. As has been pointed out, Harvard is about 1/4 jewish, and also 1/4 White Christian. Jews never suffer under the discrimination they foist on the White race. Why should they? After all, they claim they're victims, just like the negroes they champion, and we white males are the historically guilty party. These are ludicrous lies, as they are well aware, and their consciousness of the nature of the scam they're pulling is why they react so strongly to the mildest comment that hints awareness and unhappiness with their eternal, dare I say genetic, hypocrisy.
Limbaugh's comments run in the direction of mine, but they don't go nearly far enough -- the trademark of the conservative. Ask conservatism why, it has one stock, safe answer: liberalism. That's not good enough. Said Limbaugh:
"All this has become the tempest that it is because I must have been right about something," Limbaugh said. "If I wasn't right, there wouldn't be this cacophony of outrage that has sprung up in the sports writer community."
That is true. Itz the classic biter bit. Classic glass-jaw-jacking jew jacked. Every jew a Bruce who pulls up sniffling at the gate marked "Arbeit Macht Frei." The jew squalls when he's named. Hell, Limbaugh merely described his game in the most nebulous terms, he didn't even name him, and still the jew drips salty tears of hate and fear. ESPN is famous for its mocking spirit. But when you come down to it, its politics are conventional jew-liberal, with every drop of anti-White sanctimony that implies wherever the question remotely touches on politics. Blacks succeed in sports because of their abilities. Whites succeed because of the old-boy network. ESPN has long editorialized in favor of more black management. From a racial standpoint, ESPN and sports media in general treat pro football as a mopping-up operation. Too few Whites is never a problem. When the percentage of blacks in the NBA fell to 78% from 82%, blacks began to shriek about racism, and rules favoring Eastern European long-range shooters. Never that I know of has ESPN done a story on the small percentages of majority-whites in the top three professional sports, and certainly never one that sought to explain the absence as a problem, just an interesting cultural occurence. When the jew's happy with a situation, he explains. When he's unhappy, he creates issues, breaks barriers -- whatever his code word du jour for lying in order to destroy. In contrast to missing Whites, black absence from anything is considered by that very fact proof of white racism. Not just by media, but by courts. Anything minorities get is theirs to keep; what remains White the jews through their media continue to assault. The Brezhnev Doctrine applied to sports, itz. If you want out of the game, well, good luck with the "civil rights" laws passed that deny your free association. Good luck getting your voice heard across major media. The jews don't want to hear you. Even if you're syndicated in 650 markets and able to augment the jew's audience and ad rates significantly in four weeks. Buh-bye. Don't let the door smack your ass on the way out you evil racist hater guilty White man.
And that brings up another point I'd like to make for my dim friends on the left. I've read all your media critics, at least until my eyes fell down, and they all complain the problem with media is corporate consolidation, rather than the real problem: jewish control. This Limbaugh imbroglio is the perfect proof that you're wrong. You guys love to say that corporations are driven only by profit. Yet, since Limbaugh was hired viewership is up substantially: The show's rating climbed 10 percent, from 2.0 to 2.2. That is huge, in TV terms. Yet the company that Limbaugh was making all the additional revenues for was positively happy to see him go. He made them money. And yet they were happy to see him disappear. Lucy Lefty got some 'splainin' to do. Choo theery can't account for notin, man.
The forces responsible for filling any traditionally white position or shaping any traditionally white sport are continually browbeaten to give in to the colored future. This includes whole sports, such as car racing, golf, and hockey, as well as individual positions within sports that continue to be dominated by whites, although the sport itself may be predominantly black. 2003 saw the launch of a coordinated campaign to niggerize racing, complete with obnoxious photos in a men's mass-magazine of a black in a driver's suit staring down a white guy as though "the white man done stole my NASCAR blues." This campaign was waged on multiple fronts, across multiple media, and Dale Earnhardt Junior knew which way the wind was blowing when he discouraged fans from flying Southern flags. Whites can be allowed no exclusive space. You'd think whites, being so historically evil and all, jews and minorities would want to separate from in the worst way. In fact what they want to do is eat our food and screw our women while pretending that their cultures are anything but parasitic failures. They want to have their whine and drink it too. We're just supposed to shut up and go along. And if we say something they don't like, jew-etiquette calls for us to immediately apologize and withdraw.
The dumb blacks the jews have raised against us are far gone in this. They and only they will decide what may be said about them.
The National Association of Black Journalists also called for ESPN to "separate itself" from Limbaugh. ""ESPN's credibility as a journalism entity is at stake," NABJ president Herbert Lowe said in a news release. "It needs to send a clear signal that the subjects of race and equal opportunity are taken seriously at its news outlets.
That's a "professional journalist" organization essentially saying that criticism of blacks is off-limits. The kind of thing Mugabe's henchmen say when they're shutting down the last independent paper in Zimbabwe. Of course the races differ, and of course the jews controlling ESPN and its parent companies and the rest of the global media know this. But it isn't good for the New World Order to allow anyone to say it. This is how Whites are driven off the planet earth if we allow it to continue.
The tacit assumption guiding ESPN coverage, when it comes to coaching and QBs, is that whites are dinosaurs who retain positions thanks to the good-old-boy network that prevents women-and-minorities from rising to their natural level of superiority, as depicted in every single Hymiewood movie of the last forty years. Black athletes are assumed competent, and assumed to have struggled against racism to have gotten where they are. The black is taken as the normal, and anywhere the black is not is inherently suspect, inherently racist, inherently guilty. I smell issues. I smell barriers for breaking. Simultaneously, in the USA in 2003, one may freely refer to black superiority in speed and saltation, while referring to white superiority in thinking and judgment leads to firing. It is a hypocritical double standard propped up and maintained by the same jews who pass the unwritten laws about what we can and can't say in the political sphere, and for exactly the same reasons. Sports doesn't build character, sports reveals character -- and many other things the media would rather hide, such as the fact that no matter how many millions of dollars you pay a black it won't prevent it from acting like a nigger. See Thomas, see Taylor, see Tyson, see O.J., see Kobe, see, I could go on and on and on and on - forever. I know it. You know. Jew know it, too.
Sports inevitably reveals inequalities, physical and mental. The physical qualities that allow blacks to dominate where speed is required can be discussed, but the mental superiorities of whites are verboten. This suppression of obvious fact really does amount to a New Dark Age, and it is completely, entirely and 100% a function of jews controlling the media. Mentioning that control is, of course, equally verboten. Unless you're a jew comedian like Jon Stewart on a comedy newscast like The Daily Show in which you raise the issue only to mock it. You mock the powers that be -- your very own jew crew -- by enforcing their egalitarian dogma, by encouraging the dolts to laugh at and look down on anyone who sees clearly. I didn't see The Daily Show last night, but I'll bet in the next couple days, Stewart makes light of the Limbaugh situation. And I guarantee you he won't take Limbaugh's side against the jews-that-be. Because even though jews own all the major media and control what is said over them, and only "mock" themselves and their agenda in jew-safe ways -- see Saturday Night Live -- only a conspiracy nut really believes what is obvious to the naked eye, that the media are pushing an agenda that most definitely includes blacks taking over all traditionall white sports and positions therein. And only a trained conspiracy nut traces this nakedly obvious bias back to the agenda that drives politics as well as sports, and cooking, and Lifetime coverage: whatz "good for jews."
George Bodenheimer, president of ESPN and ABC Sports, issued the following response: "We accept his resignation and regret the circumstances surrounding this. We believe that he took the appropriate action to resolve this matter expeditiously."
Appropriate action? Objectively, this means that it was inappropriate for Limbaugh to describe a media agenda that includes pushing for more black QBs, even though that is undeniably just what ESPN and the rest of them do. More generally the meaning is a euphemism for the tacit tyranny we live under: anything that bothers the coloreds is out of bounds. If a black, or woman, or jew gets angry, then the white male who made the comment that elicited the response is the guilty party. This is the model AmeriKwa, a jewish production, follows. The rules were set by the media, and the media are controlled by jews. This is true, and it is obviously true. We live in a jew-whipped society, and it is unpleasant to violently dangerous. It is fair to say that in the most important ways, the jews have murdered America.
Another comment:
Wednesday night, ESPN issued a statement that, in part, read, "We have communicated to Mr. Limbaugh that his comments were insensitive and inappropriate."
Insensitive and inappropriate. The media have no problem publishing a mass-market book called Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot. King Kaufman, probably a jew, has no problem writing in today's Salon:
Rush Limbaugh is still a big fat idiot.
The blowhard is gone, but sports fans shouldn't forget how ESPN cynically sold them out for a few bucks.
Limbaugh is a clown, a dog-and-pony show with no more insight into football than he has into politics, though he proved far less entertaining in his new field than he is in his regular gig. You can blame him for his dim-witted comments and lame attempts to shoehorn his political views into football analysis, but that seems like a waste of time. Do you blame a dog for sniffing butts? Limbaugh is what he is.
Salon has no problem abusing Whites as a race or a White man as an individual as trash, rednecks, racists, crackers, butt-sniffing dogs. It would rather listen to Lawrence Welk or die than use the term 'nigger.' And Salon, like ESPN, fancies itself on the very cutting edge of fashion. Is America filled with fashionable fools presided over by a Tyranny of Jews? The answer is yes. The jew-spun liberal web is seamless: libs are perfectly protected against the slightest draft or cross-current. They are free to impugn and character-assassinate at will, but the slightest touch of "insensitivity" -- arguing with them -- and they start crying. They never stop lying.
How long do we tolerate jews controlling our minds, our media, our nation?
When all the king's horses Were turning to glue And eggs off walls fell, Into puddles of goo I turned to my right and Espied eight cuckoos. They took to their wing And as through air they flew I cocked an ear outward To hear what to do Sure they creaked and they chirpled Through beaks of bright blue "Whatever you do must Get rid of the jew."
-- Odgen Nash
2003-10-04 19:58 | User Profile
A good piece, Mr. Linder. Thanks for posting it, Bardamu.
To the top.
2003-10-05 01:20 | User Profile
Yes, it is a good piece isn't it.
Back to the top. :)
2003-10-05 01:27 | User Profile
I've read it last night.
Linder is a genius wordsmith.
And he's a learned man, too.
2003-10-06 02:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=friedrich braun]Linder is a genius wordsmith.[/QUOTE]
So true.
In this new article at Vdare.com by Steve Sailor, it's almost as if he's recasting most of Linder's argument in PC form:
Rush Was Right, Of Course. But Why?
By Steve Sailer
Democratic Presidential candidate Howard Dean, governor of the whitest state <http://www.choate.edu/alumniparent/Publications/bulletin/sum98/html/wrinn.html> in the union: "There is no legitimate place in sports broadcasting for voices that seek to discredit the achievement of athletes on the basis of race."
White sportswriters immediately dusted off their pitchforks and torches. Nobody is more hysterical about racial differences than the typical sportswriter-precisely because racial differences are so blatantly obvious in sports. But, fortunately, the internet is now here to correct Big Media. Two webzine columnists have already done excellent jobs of explaining that Rush was simply right: Karen De Coster http://www.lewrockwell.com/decoster/decoster94.html on the paleolibertarian lewrockwell.com and Allen Barra http://slate.msn.com/id/2089193/ on the neoliberal Slate.com. McNabb, who a year ago signed the most lucrative contract in the history of football http://www.blackathlete.net/Blackbox/blackbox051203.html up to that point, is a tremendous athlete. But he's not yet been more than a decent quarterback. However, having written countless articles denouncing the NFL's black quarterback lack as being the result of irrational racism, Big Media now has a vested interest in hyping the new generation of black quarterbacks to prove they were right all along. Iââ¬â¢d add that there's another reason the media has overrated McNabb: McNabb has been a bit more exciting than he has been effective. He's certainly been adequate. But you could easily get the impression from the TV sports wrap-up shows that he's the second coming of Joe Montana. http://espn.go.com/sportscentury/features/00016306.html That's because, as with many black quarterbacks, McNabbââ¬â¢s best plays, the ones that are shown over and over again, are so much more spectacular than his average plays. Personally, I've long wanted more black quarterbacks in the NFL. Living in Southern California, I don't have a team to root for. So I just watch the wrap-up shows to see amazing plays. And black quarterbacks provide of them than whites, because they are generally faster and shiftier runners. In contrast, most white quarterbacks just pass. Thus I was saddened when Atlanta Falcons quarterback, Michael Vick http://www.21cent.net/vick/, who might be the most amazing physical talent ever to play in the NFL-a runner who makes even McNabb look like poor Joe Namath after a half-dozen knee operations-broke his leg in August. To my thrill-seeking tastes, watching Peyton Manning http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12531, an old-fashioned white quarterback, efficiently dissect an opposing team (last Sunday: 20 completions in 25 attempts for 314 yards and six touchdowns http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/sports/2001750889_colts29.html) just isn't as electrifying as watching McNabb or Vick snake for fifty yards on a broken play. But then, I don't care who wins. If I were an Eagles fan, however, I would do what they've been doing this year: booing McNabb for being only mediocre at consistently moving the Eagles down the field. As fun as it is to watch, running is a secondary talent for an NFL quarterback. Unfortunately, the current black quarterbacks generally have less than spectacular passing accuracy, perhaps because they get so banged up carrying the ball. McNabb, for example, has never achieved either of the standard season benchmarks: completing 60 percent of his passes, or averaging seven yardsââ¬â¢ gain per passing attempt. Why do black quarterbacks tend to be better runners than white quarterbacks? For the same reasons that blacks tend to be better runners than whites in all sports. Perhaps the single most self-evident fact about American spectator sports is that blacks, on average, are faster http://www.isteve.com/gendrgap.htm than whites. No human being not of West African descent ever ran 100 meters in less than 10 seconds until this spring, when Patrick Johnson http://www.bigpond.com/sports/content/abcsportarticle_Cconmap_C77488.html, finally broke that barrier, 35 years after the first Sub-Saharan African. And Johnson is an interesting combination of Australian Aborigine and Irish Further, blacks tend to enjoy advantages in "real time" responsiveness-hence black strengths in running with footballs and basketballs and in jazz, rap, dance, trash talking, preaching, and oratory. As Thomas Sowell has pointed out http://www.isteve.com/blackath.htm: "To be an outstanding basketball player means to out-think opponents consistently in these split-second decisions under stress." Until about five years ago, black NFL quarterbacks were actually about as common as blacks are in the general population. But this was widely denounced in the press as proof of white racism-because blacks are so much more common in other football positions. For example, when I last checked a few years ago, 59 of the 60 starting cornerbacks were black. Quarterbacks and cornerbacks, however, require radically different skills. It's simply wrong to expect equal proportions of each race at both positions. Why? Three reasons: Cornerbacks are defenders who guard pass receivers. Speed, jumping ability and the ability to react instantaneously are crucial talents. These are all areas in which blacks tend to be strong But, in contrast, quarterbacks need arm strength and throwing accuracy. And there's no clear racial difference in throwing ability. The closest analogy to the quarterback is the baseball pitcher, whose primary job is likewise to stand and throw. Many more African-American big leaguers play the outfield, where their speed is useful, than pitch, where it's not.
Lots of young black quarterbacks switch to other positions as they grow up. Why? Basically because they can switch. Many blacks who played quarterback in grade school or high school-where the simplest strategy for winning is often to put your best athlete at quarterback and let him run with the ball-make it to the NFL in other positions, where the competition is less stiff. There are four times as many NFL starting jobs for defensive backs as there are for quarterbacks. There are three times as many for receivers. In contrast, most white quarterbacks are too slow to play anything else in the NFL, except perhaps tight end. So the handful who make it are survivors of a ferocious nationwide competition in which first prize is, you get to be an NFL quarterback-and second prize is, you get to be an insurance salesman.
The unspeakable: average racial IQ differences <http://www.vdare.com/sailer/wealth_of_nations.htm>. IQ is hardly the most important factor in football. But it matters enough that the NFL requires all college players with a chance of being drafted to take a traditional IQ test-a twelve minute, fifty question quiz that Wonderlic <http://www.wonderlic.com/> Inc. has been selling since 1938. (You can take a 15 question sample version <http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html> here.) Getting twenty questions right is roughly equal to an IQ of 100. Each additional correct answer gives you two more IQ points.
Football is a complex game with enormous playbooks that players must digest. Like the modern U.S. military http://www.vdare.com/sailer/army_and_race.htm, pro teams want players who learn reasonably quickly (although most coaches don't like eggheads or wiseguys with smart mouths, either). The average NFL player has an IQ of 98. Thatââ¬â¢s very good for a group that's majority black, because the average black American scores around 85 and the average white around 100. (The stereotype of the dumb college football player is only true relative to the real college students at fine flagship state universities like Michigan, Texas, and Georgia.) Paul D. Zimmerman, Sports Illustrated's renowned gridiron guru, reported http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228.html the following average IQ scores for certain positions among top college players invited by the NFL to the annual scouting combine: Offensive tackles: 112 Centers: 110 Quarterbacks: 108 Guards: 106 Tight Ends: 104 Safeties: 98 Middle linebackers: 98 Cornerbacks: 96 Wide receivers: 94 Fullbacks: 94 Halfbacks: 92 As you'll note, the mostly white positions are at the top of the list and the mostly black positions are at the bottom. But all the scores are fairly good. (A second list is here http://www.jsonline.com/packer/sbxxxii/news/wond12198.stm. Another list for the 2003 draft by individual player is here http://home.nycap.rr.com/chrisbrizzell/wonderlic.htm. SI's funnyman Rick Reilly recounts the scores of some famous quarterbacks here http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/inside_game/magazine/life_of_reilly/news/2001/04/17/life_of_reilly/.) Quarterbacks face the stiffest learning challenge. They have to understand not just what they are supposed to do on each play, but what everybody else is supposed to do. Accordingly, as Bob Harris wrote http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2003/fantasy/09/04/back.page/ on SI.com: "Teams want quarterbacks to score in the mid-20s [around 110] and a score in the mid-teens [around 90] is generally acceptable for the other positions." Let's say that a team has a rule of thumb that it wants to draft quarterbacks with three digit IQs. That's one-half of the white population, but only one-sixth of the black population. Since there are about five times more young white men than young black men, there are about 15 times more whites than blacks with IQs of 100 or greater. Still, over the last five years, the number of black quarterbacks has risen to about seven starters out of 32 teams. How come? In an otherwise sensible column http://www.nationalreview.com/lowry/lowry200310030952.asp, National Review Editor Rich Lowry echoes the conventional wisdom: "There once was a shortage of black quarterbacks in the NFL because of racist stereotypes about their abilities." Implication: the recent rise is because weââ¬â¢re all so enlightened now. Elementary economics suggest this is dubious. Indeed, back in 1996, when National Review was edited by John Oââ¬â¢Sullivan, I described in a cover story "How Jackie Robinson Desegregated America http://www.isteve.com/JackieRobinson.htmââ¬Â how the Brooklyn Dodgers grabbed a big edge in 1947-1956 by being the first to sign black baseball players. That racial discrimination can have costs was perfectly well understood throughout team sports three decades ago. The assumption that NFL teams would ignorantly penalize themselves by playing inferior white quarterbacks for an additional quarter of a century is silly. Instead, the recent rise in black quarterbacks is due to technical changes in the game. On the supply side, until recently there were few blacks being groomed in school to be NFL-quality passing quarterbacks because the aerial game was mostly popular among schools in the West, where not many blacks live. This "West Coast" offense has finally spread to schools in the South and the Great Lakes. Now more black quarterbacks are in the pipeline for the NFL to choose among. On the demand side, for decades, NFL teams constructed their drop-back offenses around the expectation that their quarterback's knees would inevitably become so banged up that he could barely walk, much less run. (Namath was the mythic exemplar of the perpetually-hobbled quarterback.) The special skills of black quarterbacks didn't have much value within these conservative game plans. Fortunately, over the years, improvements in surgery, turf, and physical conditioning have made it a little less necessary for teams to treat their quarterbacks like fine china. So they have been exploring the possibilities of quarterbacks who can both throw and run. It's been a slow process, however, with frustration on all sides. Football teams are like armies-it takes them a lot of trial and error to figure out how to use a new kind of weapon effectively. Perhaps surprisingly, Hollywood has already produced a good dramatization of the complicated opportunities and difficulties posed by black quarterbacks: Oliver Stone's 1999 football movie Any Given Sunday http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0146838. It's not Stone at his best (or worst), but it's a perceptive and fair depiction of the black quarterback issue by a man who gave up all hope of being politically correct years ago. Dennis Quaid plays the white drop-back quarterback who gets too banged up to play. In desperation, old-school coach Al Pacino replaces him with a young black QB (an undersized Jamie Foxx http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004937/bio) who has a chip on his shoulder because, throughout his career, coaches have tried to convert him to other positions. Foxx doesn't like studying the playbook. He just makes things up as he goes along, with often wonderful (but sometimes disastrous) results. This delights the sportswriters, who declare him "the future of football." It drives Pacino crazy. Eventually, Pacino and Foxx begin to respect each other's strengths. They reach a compromise. Foxx finally bears down and learns the playbook. Pacino gives him more freedom on the field to make things happen. Together, they win The Big Game. This Hollywood happy ending will probably eventually come true in NFL, too. Lots of talented men are working hard to make it a reality. Meanwhile, expect no toleration for those so rude as to point out that the emperor has no cleats.
2003-10-06 22:24 | User Profile
MacNabb blows. He runs nearly the same play every down, and hardly ever throws the ball more than 5 yards. He should be a halfback, not a quarterback.
And I'm from Philadelphia.
2003-10-07 00:40 | User Profile
I'lll have to give Linder credit. He's connected some dots I had not previously connected.
2003-10-07 00:53 | User Profile
Linder says Rush is "a husband of a Jew". I wonder how he arrives at that conclusion. It would certainly explain why they let him be "America's #1 radio host". I googled Marta Limbaugh and found photos of her that don't look Jewish and could not find anything to support it. Is Linder guessing?
2003-10-07 01:14 | User Profile
Is Linder guessing?
Nope. Rush got married in Israel I think and he used to often refer to his wonderful trips to the Holy Land and all that.
She's a Jewess, all right. Maybe she just had her honker trimmed.
2003-10-07 01:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis]Linder says Rush is "a husband of a Jew". I wonder how he arrives at that conclusion. It would certainly explain why they let him be "America's #1 radio host". I googled Marta Limbaugh and found photos of her that don't look Jewish and could not find anything to support it. Is Linder guessing?[/QUOTE] Their honeymoon was in Israel. That's the only confirmatory datum I have.
2003-10-07 01:55 | User Profile
Maybe [B]Fitzgerald[/B] is Marta's married name, from a previous marriage.
2003-10-07 03:03 | User Profile
Thanks for the feedback guys. I've been googling some more. Here's what the Atlanta Journal says: "In 1994, Limbaugh married Marta Fitzgerald, a former aerobics instructor from Jacksonville, Fla., he met through a computer bulletin board service. The wedding ceremony took place at the Virginia home of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who officiated."
The Journal is probably Jewish-owned like most newspapers, and we know they never lie.
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/1003/03limprofile.html;COXnetJSessionID=1CnF21VSdKgwKij7aVYpxLMk8TIRm6hQBtP6qZf4z1o3ciCxgwgu!-1311192197?urac=n&urvf=10654944056610.36395217651900025
Maybe Madsciencetype got the honeymoon mixed up with the wedding, no big deal. The Journal neglects to mention where the honeymoon took place.
Linder will probably read this thread and comment.
2003-10-07 03:25 | User Profile
[QUOTE=mwdallas]Their honeymoon was in Israel. That's the only confirmatory datum I have.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.carolontheweb.com/links/weenies.html[/url]
"Rush Limbaugh serves the neocon Jews who installed one of their own in his bedroom. Years later, he makes a casual reference to his "rabbi" and honeymoon in Israel with the "lovely Marta". We all look at each other and say whaaa? I have visions of an oozing pod, gestating in the closet beside his bed in 1999. Sometime in 2000, the eyes opened, the goo receded, and it's first words were "Death to Islam! Jew GOOD! Muslim Bad!! Kill for Peace!". But the voice wasn't quite right, so they fixed it. - spooky."
2003-10-07 03:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Robbie]Maybe [B]Fitzgerald[/B] is Marta's married name, from a previous marriage.[/QUOTE] I think this is from the same article Travis quoted:
"Fitzgerald's former husband, Tom Fitzgerald, told The Florida-Times Union in Jacksonville that his ex-wife met Limbaugh in 1990 when she sought advice on how to respond to a Reagan-bashing history professor at the University of North Florida, where she wa s a student.
Limbaugh never responded, and Fitzgerald got angry when she heard Limbaugh respond on the air to some flight attendants who had written wanting to meet him.
She wrote Limbaugh a scathing letter, calling him pompous and telling him he was wasting his time, Tom Fitzgerald told the newspaper. This time, Limbaugh responded.
That's how the whole relationship got started,'' he said.They started corresponding back and forth.''
The Fitzgeralds divorced in 1992 after six years of marriage.
Earlier this year, Limbaugh began teasing listeners of his national radio show with tidbits about his ``Jacksonville Jaguar.''
The ``Jaguar'' left Florida earlier this year and moved into Limbaugh's New York home, her mother, Esther Peluso, told The Florida-Times Union in February."
[url]http://rescomp.stanford.edu/rccresources/manual/teaching/program.html[/url]
2003-10-07 03:40 | User Profile
Is it me, or are jews framing everything to their own advantage, and dragging out the nastiest slurs in the book to attack anybody who objects?
Huh. Hadn't noticed.