← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Walter Yannis
Thread ID: 10088 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2003-09-28
2003-09-28 10:28 | User Profile
This appeared in First Things magazine.
[url]http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0305/articles/dulles.html[/url]
Walter
Avery Cardinal Dulles
Copyright (c) 2003 First Things 133 (May 2003): 36-41.
Sometimes the complaint is heard that no one preaches about hell any longer. The subject of hell, if not attractive, is at least fascinating, as any reader of Danteââ¬â¢s Inferno or Miltonââ¬â¢s Paradise Lost can testify. Equally fascinating, and decidedly more pressing, is the question of how many of us may be expected to go there when we die.
As we know from the Gospels, Jesus spoke many times about hell. Throughout his preaching, he holds forth two and only two final possibilities for human existence: the one being everlasting happiness in the presence of God, the other everlasting torment in the absence of God. He describes the fate of the damned under a great variety of metaphors: everlasting fire, outer darkness, tormenting thirst, a gnawing worm, and weeping and gnashing of teeth.
In the parable of the sheep and the goats, Jesus indicates that some will be condemned. The Son of man says to the goats: ââ¬ÅDepart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angelsââ¬Â (Matthew 25:41). In the Gospel of John, which says comparatively little about hell, Jesus is quoted as saying: ââ¬ÅThe hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear [the Fatherââ¬â¢s] voice and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgmentââ¬Â (John 5:28-29).
The apostles, understandably concerned, asked: ââ¬ÅLord, will those who are saved be few?ââ¬Â Without directly answering their question Jesus replied: ââ¬ÅStrive to enter by the narrow door; for many, I tell you, will seek to enter and not be ableââ¬Â (Luke 13:23-24). In the parallel passage from Matthew, Jesus says: ââ¬ÅEnter by the narrow gate, for the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are fewââ¬Â (Matthew 7:13-14). In a parable immediately following this exchange, Jesus speaks of those who try to come to the marriage feast, but are told: ââ¬ÅDepart from me, all you workers of iniquity. There you will weep and gnash your teethââ¬Â (Luke 13:27-28). In another parable, that of the wedding guest who is cast out for not wearing the proper attire, Jesus declares: ââ¬ÅMany are called, but few are chosenââ¬Â (Matthew 22:14). Taken in their obvious meaning, passages such as these give the impression that there is a hell, and that many go there; more, in fact, than are saved.
The New Testament does not tell us in so many words that any particular person is in hell. But several statements about Judas can hardly be interpreted otherwise. Jesus says that he has kept all those whom the Father has given him except the son of perdition (John 17:12). At another point Jesus calls Judas a devil (John 6:70), and yet again says of him: ââ¬ÅIt would be better for that man if he had never been bornââ¬Â (Matthew 26:24; Mark 14:21). If Judas were among the saved, these statements could hardly be true. Many saints and doctors of the Church, including St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, have taken it as a revealed truth that Judas was reprobated. Some of the Fathers place the name of Nero in the same select company, but they do not give long lists of names, as Dante would do.
References to punishment after death in the remainder of the New Testament simply confirm the teaching of the Gospels. In the Book of Acts Paul says that those ordained to eternal life have believed his preaching, whereas those who disbelieved it have judged themselves unworthy of eternal life (Acts 13:46-48). Peterââ¬â¢s First Letter puts the question: ââ¬ÅIf the righteous man is scarcely to be saved, where will the impious and sinner appear?ââ¬Â (1 Peter 4:18). The Book of Revelation teaches that there is a fiery pit where Satan and those who follow him will be tormented forever. It states at one point: ââ¬ÅAs for the cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, as for murderers, fornicators, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their lot shall be the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second deathââ¬Â (Revelation 21:8).
The testimony of Paul is complex. In his First Letter to the Thessalonians he speaks of the coming divine judgment, in which Jesus will inflict vengeance ââ¬Åupon those who do not know God and upon those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They shall suffer the punishment of eternal destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lordââ¬Â (1 Thessalonians 1:9-10). In his epistle to the Romans Paul says that the impenitent Jews are storing up wrath for themselves on the day of judgment (Romans 2:5). In writing to the Corinthians he distinguishes between those who are being saved by the gospel and those who are perishing because of their failure to accept it (1 Corinthians 1:18). In a variety of texts he gives lists of sins that will exclude people from the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-10; Galatians 5:19-21; Ephesians 5:3-6). And he tells the Philippians: ââ¬ÅWork out your salvation in fear and tremblingââ¬Â (Philippians 2:12).
Some passages in the letters of Paul lend themselves to a more optimistic interpretation, but they can hardly be used to prove that salvation is universal. In Romans 8:19-21 Paul predicts that ââ¬Åcreation itself will be set free from its bondage of decay and obtain the glorious liberty of the children of God,ââ¬Â but the text seems to refer to the world of nature; it does not say that all human beings will achieve the glorious liberty in question. In 1 Corinthians 15:28 Paul speaks of all things being ultimately subjected to Christ, but he does not imply that subjection means salvation. He presumably means that the demonic powers will ultimately be defeated. In Philippians 2:9-10 he predicts that eventually every knee will bow to Christ and every tongue confess him. But this need not mean a confession that proceeds from love. In the Gospels the devils proclaim that Jesus is the Holy One of God, but they are not saved by recognizing the fact.
Equally unavailing, in my opinion, are appeals to passages that say that Godââ¬â¢s plan is to reconcile all things in Christ (Ephesians 1:10; Colossians 1:19-20). Although this is surely Godââ¬â¢s intent, He does not override the freedom that enables men and women to resist His holy will. The same may be said of the statement that God ââ¬Ådesires all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truthââ¬Â (1 Timothy 2:4). Paul is apparently seeking to stimulate the apostolic zeal of missionaries who will bring the saving truth of Christ to all who do not yet believe. The absolute necessity of faith for salvation is a constant theme in the writings of Paul. I see no reason, then, for ranking Paul among the universalists.
The constant teaching of the Catholic Church supports the idea that there are two classes: the saved and the damned. Three general councils of the Church (Lyons I, 1245; Lyons II, 1274; and Florence, 1439) and Pope Benedict XIIââ¬â¢s bull Benedictus Deus (1336) have taught that everyone who dies in a state of mortal sin goes immediately to suffer the eternal punishments of hell. This belief has perdured without question in the Catholic Church to this day, and is repeated almost verbatim in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC ç1022, 1035). Several local councils in the Middle Ages, without apparently intending to define the point, state in passing that some have actually died in a state of sin and been punished by eternal damnation.
The relative numbers of the elect and the damned are not treated in any Church documents, but have been a subject of discussion among theologians. Among the Greek Fathers, Irenaeus, Basil, and Cyril of Jerusalem are typical in interpreting passages such as Matthew 22:14 as meaning that the majority will be consigned to hell. St. John Chrysostom, an outstanding doctor of the Eastern tradition, was particularly pessimistic: ââ¬ÅAmong thousands of people there are not a hundred who will arrive at their salvation, and I am not even certain of that number, so much perversity is there among the young and so much negligence among the old.ââ¬Â
Augustine may be taken as representative of the Western Fathers. In his controversy with the Donatist Cresconius, Augustine draws upon Matthew and the Book of Revelation to prove that the number of the elect is large, but he grants that their number is exceeded by that of the lost. In Book 21 of his City of God he rebuts first the idea that all human beings are saved, then that all the baptized are saved, then that all baptized Catholics are saved, and finally that all baptized Catholics who persevere in the faith are saved. He seems to limit salvation to baptized believers who refrain from serious sin or who, after sinning, repent and are reconciled with God.
The great Scholastics of the Middle Ages are not more sanguine. Thomas Aquinas, who may stand as the leading representative, teaches clearly in the Summa Theologiae that God reprobates some persons. A little later he declares that only God knows the number of the elect. But Thomas gives reasons for thinking that their number is relatively small. Since our human nature is fallen, and since eternal blessedness is a gift far beyond the powers and merits of every created nature, it is to be expected that most human beings fall short of achieving that goal.
The leading theologians of the baroque period follow suit. Francisco Suarez, in his treatise on predestination, puts the question squarely: How many are saved? Relying on the Gospel of Matthew, St. John Chrysostom, St. Augustine, and Pope St. Gregory, he proposes the following estimation. If the question is asked about all men living between the creation and the end of the world, the number of the reprobate certainly exceeds that of the elect. This is to be expected because God was not rightly known before the coming of Christ, and even since that time many remain in darkness. If the term ââ¬ÅChristianââ¬Â is taken to include heretics, schismatics, and baptized apostates, it would still appear that most are damned. But if the question is put about those who die in the Catholic Church, Suarez submits his opinion that the majority are saved, since many die before they can sin mortally, and many others are fortified by the sacraments.
Suarez is relatively optimistic in comparison with other Catholic theologians of his day. Peter Canisius and Robert Bellarmine, for example, were convinced that most of the human race is lost.
Several studies published by Catholics early in the twentieth century concluded that there was a virtual consensus among the Fathers of the Church and the Catholic theologians of later ages to the effect that the majority of humankind go to eternal punishment in hell. Even if this consensus be granted, however, it is not binding, because the theologians did not claim that their opinion was revealed, or that to take the opposite view was heretical. Nor is the opinion that most people attain salvation contradicted by authoritative Church teaching.
Mention should here be made of a minority opinion among some of the Greek Fathers. Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Gregory Nazianzen, and Gregory of Nyssa sometimes speak as though in the end all will be saved. Origen, the most prominent representative of this view, is generally reported as teaching that at the end of time, the damned, now repentant and purified, will take part in the universal restoration of all things (apokatastasis). Three centuries after Origenââ¬â¢s death his views on this and several other topics were condemned by a local council of Constantinople convened by the Emperor Justinian in a.d. 563. Even in his lifetime, however, Origen claimed that his adversaries had misunderstood or misrepresented him. A number of distinguished scholars down through the centuries have defended his orthodoxy on the fate of the damned. The doctrine of the eternity of hell has been firmly in place at least since the seventh century, and is not subject to debate in the Catholic Church.
About the middle of the twentieth century, there seems to be a break in the tradition. Since then a number of influential theologians have favored the view that all human beings may or do eventually attain salvation. Some examples may be illustrative.
In a ââ¬Åreverieââ¬Â circulated among friends but not published until after his death, the philosopher Jacques Maritain included what he called a ââ¬Åconjectural essayââ¬Â on eschatology, in which he contemplates the possibility that the damned, although eternally in hell, may be able at some point to escape from pain. In response to the prayers of the saints, he imagines, God may miraculously convert their wills, so that from hating Him they come to love Him. After being pardoned, they will then be delivered from the pain of sense and placed in a kind of limbo. They will still be technically in hell, since they will lack the beatific vision, but they will enjoy a kind of natural felicity, like that of infants who die without baptism. At the end, he speculates, even Satan will be converted, and the fiery inferno, while it continues to exist, will have no spirits to afflict. This, as Maritain acknowledged, is a bold conjecture, since it has no support in Scripture or tradition, and contradicts the usual understanding of texts such as the parable of the Last Judgment scene of Matthew. But the theory has the advantage of showing how the Blood of Christ might obtain mercy for all spiritual creatures, even those eternally in hell.
Karl Rahner, another representative of the more liberal trend, holds for the possibility that no one ever goes to hell. We have no clear revelation, he says, to the effect that some are actually lost. The discourses of Jesus on the subject appear to be admonitory rather than predictive. Their aim is to persuade his hearers to pursue the better and safer path by alerting them to the danger of eternal perdition. While allowing for the real possibility of eternal damnation, says Rahner, we must simultaneously maintain ââ¬Åthe truth of the omnipotence of the universal salvific will of God, the redemption of all by Christ, the duty of men to hope for salvation.ââ¬Â Rahner therefore believes that universal salvation is a possibility.
The most sophisticated theological argument against the conviction that some human beings in fact go to hell has been proposed by Hans Urs von Balthasar in his book Dare We Hope ââ¬ÅThat All Men Be Saved?ââ¬Â He rejects the ideas that hell will be emptied at the end of time and that the damned souls and demons will be reconciled with God. He also avoids asserting as a fact that everyone will be saved. But he does say that we have a right and even a duty to hope for the salvation of all, because it is not impossible that even the worst sinners may be moved by Godââ¬â¢s grace to repent before they die. He concedes, however, that the opposite is also possible. Since we are able to resist the grace of God, none of us is safe. We must therefore leave the question speculatively open, thinking primarily of the danger in which we ourselves stand.
At one point in his book Balthasar incorporates a long quotation from Edith Stein, now Saint Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, who defends a position very like Balthasarââ¬â¢s. Since Godââ¬â¢s all-merciful love, she says, descends upon everyone, it is probable that this love produces transforming effects in their lives. To the extent that people open themselves to that love, they enter into the realm of redemption. On this ground Stein finds it possible to hope that Godââ¬â¢s omnipotent love finds ways of, so to speak, outwitting human resistance. Balthasar says that he agrees with Stein.
This position of Balthasar seems to me to be orthodox. It does not contradict any ecumenical councils or definitions of the faith. It can be reconciled with everything in Scripture, at least if the statements of Jesus on hell are taken as minatory rather than predictive. Balthasarââ¬â¢s position, moreover, does not undermine a healthy fear of being lost. But the position is at least adventurous. It runs against the obvious interpretation of the words of Jesus in the New Testament and against the dominant theological opinion down through the centuries, which maintains that some, and in fact very many, are lost.
The conviction of earlier theologians that relatively few are saved rests, I suspect, partly on the assumption that faith in Christ, baptism, and adherence to the Church are necessary conditions for salvation. The first two of these conditions are clearly set forth in the New Testament, and the third has been taught by many saints, councils, popes, and theologians. But these conditions can be interpreted more broadly than one might suspect. In recent centuries it has become common to speak of implicit faith, baptism ââ¬Åby desire,ââ¬Â and membership in the ââ¬Åsoulââ¬Â of the Church, or membership in voto (ââ¬Åby desireââ¬Â). Vatican II declares that all people, even those who have never heard of Christ, receive enough grace to make their salvation possible.
The Church continues to insist that explicit faith, reception of the sacraments, and obedience to the Church are the ordinary means to salvation. Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (1864) accordingly condemned the proposition: ââ¬ÅWe should at least have good hopes for the eternal salvation of those who are in no way in the true Church of Christ.ââ¬Â Pius XII in his encyclical on the Mystical Body of Christ (Mystici Corporis, 1943) taught that even those who are united to the Church by bonds of implicit desireââ¬âa state that can by no means be taken for grantedââ¬âstill lack many precious means that are available in the Church and therefore ââ¬Åcannot be sure of their salvation.ââ¬Â Vatican II said that anyone who knows that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ and refuses to enter her cannot be saved. If we accept these teachings, we will find it unlikely that everyone fulfills the conditions for salvation.
Pope John Paul II in his Crossing the Threshold of Hope mentions the theory of Balthasar. After putting the question whether a loving God can allow any human being to be condemned to eternal torment, he replies: ââ¬ÅAnd yet the words of Christ are unequivocal. In Matthewââ¬â¢s Gospel he speaks clearly of those who will go to eternal punishment (cf. Matthew 25:46).ââ¬Â As justification for this assessment the Pope puts the rhetorical question: Can God, who is ultimate justice, tolerate terrible crimes and let them go unpunished? Final punishment would seem to be necessary to reestablish the moral equilibrium in the complex history of humanity.
In a General Audience talk of July 28, 1999, the Pope seems to have shifted his position, adopting in effect that of Balthasar. According to the English version of the text he said:
Christian faith teaches that in taking the risk of saying ââ¬Åyesââ¬Â or ââ¬Åno,ââ¬Â which marks the (human) creatureââ¬â¢s freedom, some have already said no. They are the spiritual creatures that rebelled against Godââ¬â¢s love and are called demons (cf. Fourth Lateran Council). What happened to them is a warning to us: it is a continuous call to avoid the tragedy which leads to sin and to conform our life to that of Jesus who lived his life with a ââ¬Åyesââ¬Â to God. Eternal damnation remains a possibility, but we are not granted, without special divine revelation, the knowledge of whether or which human beings are effectively involved in it. The thought of hellââ¬âand even less the improper use of biblical imagesââ¬âmust not create anxiety or despair, but is a necessary and healthy reminder of freedom within the proclamation that the risen Jesus has conquered Satan, giving us the Spirit of God who makes us cry ââ¬ÅAbba, Father!ââ¬Â (Romans 8:15; Galatians 4:6) The last sentence refers to the hope of Christians for their own salvation and cannot be used to support any theory of universal salvation. But the preceding sentence indicates at least an openness to the opinion that we may hope for the salvation of all.
Although the Pope may have abandoned his criticism of Balthasar, a number of theologians remain opposed. In a supplement to his book, Balthasar himself reports that one reviewer accused him of supporting ââ¬Åthe salvation optimism that is rampant today and is both thoughtless and a temptation to thoughtlessness.ââ¬Â At an international videoconference organized by the Holy Seeââ¬â¢s Congregation for the Clergy last November, Jean Galot, with an apparent reference to Balthasar, said that the hypothesis of hell as a mere possibility ââ¬Åremoves all effectiveness from the warnings issued by Jesus, repeatedly expressed in the Gospels.ââ¬Â At the same conference Father Michael F. Hull of New York contended that Balthasarââ¬â¢s theory is ââ¬Åtantamount to a rejection of the doctrine of hell and a denial of manââ¬â¢s free will.ââ¬Â In this country Fr. Regis Scanlon, O.F.M. Cap., accused Balthasar of being a Hegelian relativist who ââ¬Åsmuggles into the heart of the Catholic a serious doubt about the truth of the Catholic faith.ââ¬Â Scanlon himself takes it to be Catholic teaching that some persons, at least Judas, are in fact eternally lost. This article set off an epic controversy between two Catholic editors, Richard John Neuhaus and Dale Vree, both of whom came to Catholic Christianity as adults.
Neuhaus fired the opening salvo in the June/July 2000 issue of First Things. Defending Balthasar against Scanlon, he cited the passages from the Popeââ¬â¢s Crossing the Threshold of Hope mentioned above and referred also to his own book, Death on a Friday Afternoon, in which he had argued from several New Testament texts that although we cannot be certain, we may indeed hope and pray for the salvation of all.
Dale Vree came back in the New Oxford Review with an article titled ââ¬ÅIf Everyone Is Saved . . . ,ââ¬Â defending Regis Scanlon and rejecting Neuhausââ¬â¢ exegesis of the biblical texts he had quoted. He also claimed to have found a statement in Neuhausââ¬â¢ book that could be interpreted as implying that everyone will be saved.
Neuhaus responded in First Things that Vreeââ¬â¢s attack was based on a misrepresentation. He had never taught the doctrine known as universalism, namely that all will be saved. He asserted only that we may hope that all will ultimately come to salvation. This probably should have been the end of the matter, but Vree in the May 2001 issue of NOR insisted that he had not misread Neuhausââ¬â¢ book and repeated his charges. Then, in its July/August 2001 issue, NOR published a defense of Neuhaus by Janet Holl Madigan which made serious charges against Vree and against NOR itself. Vree responded in the same issue.
The August/September 2001 issue of First Things contained Neuhausââ¬â¢ own clarification of what he intended to say in his book. He presented an excellent case for holding that we may hope and pray for the salvation for all. In an October 2001 editorial in NOR, Vree expressed moderate satisfaction with Neuhausââ¬â¢ clarification, but still had objections to various statements that Neuhaus had not retracted.
Like Vree, I accept the substance of this final intervention of Neuhaus, but I find some obscurity in his argument. He says that certain Pauline texts (most of which I have cited above) ââ¬Åsupportââ¬Â universal redemption. If we give priority to these passages, Neuhaus argues, we have to interpret the Gospel passages about damnation as ââ¬Åadmonitory and cautionary, solemn warnings of a terrible possibility.ââ¬Â
Neuhaus does not say (and, I am sure, does not mean) that Paul in the passages he quotes actually teaches universal salvation. If so, Paul would be turning the Gospel warnings into empty threats, and would be taking a position contrary to the constant tradition of the Church. I can agree that these ââ¬Åoptimisticââ¬Â passages, taken in isolation, could be interpreted as expressing a confidence that all will be saved. But that interpretation is unacceptable even as an interpretation of Paulââ¬â¢s mind, because it runs counter to other texts, several of which I have quoted above, in which Paul evidently supposes that some are in fact lost. My conclusion would be that even if we give full value to the Pauline passages quoted by Neuhaus, the Gospel warnings could still be understood as predictions that some will be condemned.
Also contestable is Neuhausââ¬â¢ speculation that ââ¬Åperhaps the fate of Judas is that of total annihilation.ââ¬Â The constant teaching of the Magisterium has been that unrepentant sinners are sent to eternal punishment. Judas must be in hell unless he repented.
It is unfair and incorrect to accuse either Balthasar or Neuhaus of teaching that no one goes to hell. They grant that it is probable that some or even many do go there, but they assert, on the ground that God is capable of bringing any sinner to repentance, that we have a right to hope and pray that all will be saved. The fact that something is highly improbable need not prevent us from hoping and praying that it will happen. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, ââ¬ÅIn hope, the Church prays for ââ¬Ëall men to be savedââ¬â¢ (1 Timothy 2:4)ââ¬Â (CCC ç1821). At another point the Catechism declares: ââ¬ÅThe Church prays that no one should be lostââ¬Â (CCC ç1058).
One might ask at this point whether there has been any shift in Catholic theology on the matter. The answer appears to be Yes, although the shift is not as dramatic as some imagine. The earlier pessimism was based on the unwarranted assumption that explicit Christian faith is absolutely necessary for salvation. This assumption has been corrected, particularly at Vatican II. There has also been a healthy reaction against the type of preaching that revels in depicting the sufferings of the damned in the most lurid possible light. An example would be the fictional sermon on hell that James Joyce recounts in his Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. This kind of preaching fosters an image of God as an unloving and cruel tyrant, and in some cases leads to a complete denial of hell or even to atheism.
Today a kind of thoughtless optimism is the more prevalent error. Quite apart from what theologians teach, popular piety has become saccharine. Unable to grasp the rationale for eternal punishment, many Christians take it almost for granted that everyone, or practically everyone, must be saved. The Mass for the Dead has turned into a Mass of the Resurrection, which sometimes seems to celebrate not so much the resurrection of the Lord as the salvation of the deceased, without any reference to sin and punishment. More education is needed to convince people that they ought to fear God who, as Jesus taught, can punish soul and body together in hell (cf. Matthew 10:28).
The search for numbers in the demography of hell is futile. God in His wisdom has seen fit not to disclose any statistics. Several sayings of Jesus in the Gospels give the impression that the majority are lost. Paul, without denying the likelihood that some sinners will die without sufficient repentance, teaches that the grace of Christ is more powerful than sin: ââ¬ÅWhere sin increased, grace abounded all the moreââ¬Â (Romans 5:20). Passages such as these permit us to hope that very many, if not all, will be saved.
All told, it is good that God has left us without exact information. If we knew that virtually everybody would be damned, we would be tempted to despair. If we knew that all, or nearly all, are saved, we might become presumptuous. If we knew that some fixed percent, say fifty, would be saved, we would be caught in an unholy rivalry. We would rejoice in every sign that others were among the lost, since our own chances of election would thereby be increased. Such a competitive spirit would hardly be compatible with the gospel.
We are forbidden to seek our own salvation in a selfish and egotistical way. We are keepers of our brothers and sisters. The more we work for their salvation, the more of Godââ¬â¢s favor we can expect for ourselves. Those of us who believe and make use of the means that God has provided for the forgiveness of sins and the reform of life have no reason to fear. We can be sure that Christ, who died on the Cross for us, will not fail to give us the grace we need. We know that in all things God works for the good of those who love Him, and that if we persevere in that love, nothing whatever can separate us from Christ (cf. Romans 8:28-39). That is all the assurance we can have, and it should be enough.
Avery Cardinal Dulles, S.J., holds the Laurence J. McGinley Chair in Religion and Society at Fordham University. This essay is adapted from his Laurence J. McGinley Lecture delivered at Fordham University on November 20, 2002.
2003-09-28 16:41 | User Profile
Even if Jesus indulged in hyperbole and threats, you really don't want to be on the wrong side of God.
2003-09-29 02:25 | User Profile
I believe Race Traitors should go to Hell, as well as people who put other things (such as money, and social acceptance) above their Race, though I don't suppose Cardinal Dulles would agree.
2003-10-01 16:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Happy Hacker]Even if Jesus indulged in hyperbole and threats, you really don't want to be on the wrong side of God.[/QUOTE]
I think that the important thing to keep in mind is that belief in Hell, combined with the belief in the very real possibility of spending Eternity there, is absolutely necessary for a vital Christianity.
After all, what could motivate a man more than fear of never-ending torment for transgressions versus eternal bliss for moral rectitude?
Clearly, nothing can compare to that for focusing a man's mind on avoiding temptation and pursuing good works, and modern Christianity's tacit rejection of Hell is the direct cause of the Church's moral squishiness.
We must preach Hell, and preach it hard. We must convince our brothers of the Revealed Truth that this life is deadly serious, and that you only get one shot at it.
Only then will we be worthy to build on the vision of our Puritain (and Jesuit) ancestors.
His Eminence sees this obvious truth, but shrinks from speaking it forthrightly.
Walter
2003-10-01 17:15 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]I think that the important thing to keep in mind is that belief in Hell, combined with the belief in the very real possibility of spending Eternity there, is an absolutely necessary for a vital Christianity.
After all, what could motivate a man more than fear of never-ending torment for transgressions versus eternal bliss for moral rectitude?
Clearly, nothing can compare to that for focusing a man's mind on avoiding temptation and pursuing good works, and modern Christianity's tacit rejection of Hell is the direct cause of the Church's moral squishiness.
We must preach Hell, and preach it hard. We must convince our brothers of the Revealed Truth that this life is deadly serious, and that you only get one shot at it.
Only then will we be worthy to build on the vision of our Puritain (and Jesuit) ancestors.
His Eminence sees this obvious truth, but shrinks from speaking it forthrightly.
Walter
Walter[/QUOTE]
Walter, Your thoughts are precise on the exact problem with the Church of Christ in the current milieu. However, it has been declared by God Himself that the Son shall come again on the Last and Final Day and these things MUST come to pass. Satan, through the allowance of God, has taken seat in the Churches and whatever apostasy comes forth is the 'abomination of desolation'. By the Churches failing to preach hard on Sin, Hell and Damnation, Satan is gathering new members at an alarming pace........
Churches not preaching Hell, Churches anointing homosexuals and women to high places within the Church, Sunday-Lord's Day throughout our land is of no significance any longer to a huge majority, Churches bending God's word to fit today's trends-eg. divorce and re-marrying, everbody is saved, etc.
Some verses:
Jeremiah 44:22
So that the LORD could no longer bear, because of the evil of your doings,
and because of the abominations which ye have committed; therefore is
your land a desolation, and an astonishment, and a curse, without an
inhabitant, as at this day.
(Whole Chapter: Jeremiah 44 In context: Jeremiah 44:21-23)
Matthew 24:15
When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by
Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him
understand)
(Whole Chapter: Matthew 24 In context: Matthew 24:14-16)
Mark 13:14
But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel
the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth
understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:
(Whole Chapter: Mark 13 In context: Mark 13:13-15)
The parts I'm studying here are Matthew and Mark. Matthew commands the saved to "stand in the holy place" which can be easily interpreted as staying in the Church. In Mark's Gospel, he relays to the saved to "flee to the mountains" which to my Christian brothers, can mean to leave apostate churches at once, since they have ALL come under the abomination of desolations, and Christ's return is nigh. I'm still studying but it is clear that judgement is near. (Please know that I'm NOT a dispensationalist!)
The church I attend on Sundays, is [I]tres[/I] weak on Hell and Damnation, and this an Orthodox Presbyterian Church.
I just don't know where to go.
2003-10-01 18:46 | User Profile
The attitude, or outright teaching, that everyone (except white racists, of course) will eventually be saved, has been one of the most emasculating beliefs of the modern church. This has gutted the imperative of Right and Wrong leading many Christians to think that required saccharine love rules out holding moral positions (except moral positions against white racists, of course) which is mean.
In other words, all homosexuals will be saved so instead of warning people of the sin of homosexual behavior, we should embrace homosexuals in their sin. Ignore that the Bible calls them reprobates (get a dictionary). Ignore that the Bible says they will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Ignore that the Bible (OT and NT) says they should be put to death. Ignore the Bible when it says to not associate with them. Ignore the Bible when it says to expel them from our churches.
2003-10-01 18:55 | User Profile
I remember one sentence from a Presbyterian theologian that I thought was interesting. "God maybe slow to anger, but that doesn't mean God doesn't get angry. Just because God is forgiving doesn't mean anything goes."
2003-10-02 04:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]Wouldn't it be funny if you found out that you picked the wrong religion? There you are in hell with all the other good Christians. Only to find out that you had to be a Mormon to get into heaven. That would just be a bitch.[/QUOTE]
[I]Dude[/I], are you like capable of saying anything intelligent man?
2003-10-02 07:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Happy Hacker]Even if Jesus indulged in hyperbole and threats, you really don't want to be on the wrong side of God.[/QUOTE]
Amen to that.
Walter
2003-10-02 07:50 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Churches not preaching Hell, Churches anointing homosexuals and women to high places within the Church, Sunday-Lord's Day throughout our land is of no significance any longer to a huge majority, Churches bending God's word to fit today's trends-eg. divorce and re-marrying, everbody is saved, etc.[/QUOTE]
There is no doubt that Christ believed in Hell and that most people went there.
I see no other way reasonably to interpret the scriptures and traditions cited by His Eminence above.
I wish that I could advise you of a good church where you could shelter, but I'm a Catholic (and an American Catholic, to boot). Our theology is red and our clergy is lavender.
Walter