← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Chaucer
Thread ID: 10058 | Posts: 24 | Started: 2003-09-26
2003-09-26 18:40 | User Profile
Blame the Jews
Posted: September 26, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
é 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Although the administration's Jewish neoconservatives share the same policy positions as their gentile compatriots, they are being portrayed ââ¬â at times subtly, at times not so subtly ââ¬â as the instigators of the administration's blunders, but more seriously as being agents of Ariel Sharon and his Likud Party, essentially doing Israel's bidding.
The chatterboxes promoting this wild-eyed view will concede that most rational people at the time saw through the lies that took us to war. They imply, however, that this was beyond Mr. Bush's ken and responsibilities. Neither was it, apparently, his duty to abide by his campaign commitment to a humble foreign policy. Mr. Bush was simply "bamboozled" ââ¬â this manifestly neoconservative (and unrepentant) president is not responsible for his blind quest for power.
In other words, the Jewish neoconservatives ate the president's homework.
Patrick J. Buchanan, for instance, is perfectly capable of entertaining the "complicity of the president of the United States in perpetrating fraud" when it comes to FDR, who, he claims, lied the U.S. into war with Germany, aided by a forged document. But when it concerns Mr. Bush, Mr. Buchanan finds it impossible to believe the president would deliberately lie to the nation. Either he was misled, or he was deceived."
Perhaps there were fewer Jews to blame in FDR's administration. Either way, too many paleoconservatives are ignoring that Wolfowitz is not the only thug pressed up against the famous bow, screaming, "I'm the king of the world." Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Woolsey, Bolton, Rice and Powell are right there beside the Jews, hollering, "Me first." Equally, and on the lower decks, Richard Perle is flanked by neoconservative Christians like Gary Bauer and William Bennett.
Kevin MacDonald, at least, comes straight out with it. Instead of the cowardly, infantile, and frankly nauseating nudge-nudge, wink-wink insinuations about Jews, he offers grand conspiracy. Jewish neocons recruited all the non-Jews and now manipulate them like marionettes. No mortal (read gentile) could possibly resist a Jewish intellectual ââ¬â that a cabal of Jews allegedly hijacked the administration is because gullible gentiles are powerless in the face of Jewish persuasion, or so it goes according to MacDonald's unique Science of Jews.
The argument that Jews act collectively to promote interests which are exclusively Jewish, also means, says MacDonald, that Jewish neoconservatives are in cahoots with the larger "organized Jewish community," all working to promote a Jewish agenda that is "arguably only tenuously related to the interests of the U.S."
MacDonald has proof. Immigration policy "provides a valuable acid test for the proposition that neoconservatism is actually a vehicle for perceived Jewish ethnic interests." "In their attitude to race and immigration," neoconservatives differ from mainstream conservatives, but resemble attitudes held by the Jewish community, he warns.
However, in his messy habit of mind, MacDonald omits that on issues of race and immigration, neocons are not that different from liberals. Jews, of course, are incorrigible liberals. Inasmuch as neocon views are leftist on race and immigration (and the welfare state), Jews would share their opinions. And so would countless other American egalitarians.
Indeed, liberalism (and I don't mean classical liberalism) is a pathology Jews share with a good many Americans. Most Jews don't like the Right and that, incidentally, includes the Israeli Right, represented by Ariel Sharon. It is far from clear that Jews, at large, identify with neoconservatives. Considering that most Americans supported the war in Iraq, Jews, to the extent they supported it, were wrong but not unique.
Jewish organizations, as a rule, do promote liberal causes and policies such as multiculturalism. But it isn't obvious that this practice is conducive to the health of the Jewish community. At the very least, there is a contradiction between the leftist ideology so many Jews embrace, with its indifference to assimilation and its extreme tolerance for alternative lifestyles, and the survival of the Jewish religion and people.
MacDonald's assertion that Jews support open immigration policies so that they can bring about a more diverse society in order to diminish anti-Semitism" and promote "Jewish ethnic interests" must be questioned, especially in the post-Sept. 11 world.
Jews have little to gain by advocating for minority communities with which they haven't much in common, culturally or socioeconomically, and who are likely to be hostile to them. How does promoting immigration from Muslim countries, for instance, benefit Jewish interests?
Jewish activism, if anything, is self defeating as a group strategy. The community's egalitarianism is thus more accurately seen as a function of liberal pathology, the same pathology so many Christian denominations exhibit ââ¬â they all believe, mistakenly, that they are promoting justice.
All in all, the paleoconservatives' attempts to blame Jews for pervasive gentile madness, such as Mr. Bush's war in Iraq, his lingering presence in Afghanistan, multiculturalism and "mass, non-traditional-immigration," is too silly to sustain, but, at the same time, a little sinister. (Next, MacDonald will hold Jews responsible for loading the Episcopal Church with homosexuals.)
About the Jewish psyche, MacDonald shows complete ignorance: Justified or not, Jews are petrified of anti-Semitism. I used to think they were mistaken. I still believe Jews express this deep-seated fear shamefully and inappropriately. But in light of recent scapegoating, I am no longer sure about anti-Semitism's obsolescence.
The MacDonald Fe-Fi-Fo-Fum Science of sniffing out Jewish intellectual habits makes me (as a Jew) wary of mentioning Sigmund Freud in any capacity. (Certainly not much store should be put on his theories about human nature.)
Nevertheless, there's no harm in a joke. When Freud was once quizzed about his incessant cigar smoking, he humorously chose to sidestep what was, according to the very theory he invented, a manifestation of his own oral fixation. He replied: "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."
And sometimes, anti-Semitism is just anti-Semitism.
[url]http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34794[/url]
2003-09-26 19:23 | User Profile
Good find, Chaucer, and thanks for posting it.
It'll be interesting to see how this thread develops.
2003-09-26 19:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE]About the Jewish psyche, MacDonald shows complete ignorance: Justified or not, Jews are petrified of anti-Semitism.[/QUOTE]
Why would they be so petrified, Ilana? What are they afraid of? Are they afraid White folks hate the fact that America is approaching Third World status and are going to blame them?? Sorry, the jews ARE responsible for America's decline.
Media, Hollywood, Wall St, Government are not disproportionately represented by jews? Trent Lott and hundreds of others have to grovel for the media because of some un-PC remarks they make? Who decides the validity of certain issues?
Ilana, lamp shades and soap are easily found in stores these days, so don't worry about it.....just talk to your psychotherapist. :dung:
2003-09-26 20:29 | User Profile
"Kevin MacDonald, at least, comes straight out with it. Instead of the cowardly, infantile, and frankly nauseating nudge-nudge, wink-wink insinuations about Jews, he offers grand conspiracy. "
What?? Anyone who knows KMacD's work knows that he says that Jewish behavior is GENETIC, not a "conspiracy." This is amazing! Truly amazing!
2003-09-26 20:44 | User Profile
Mercer should learn that the first thing to do to get out of a hole is to stop digging. All sorts of good stuff here. This, for example.
[QUOTE]Perhaps there were fewer Jews to blame in FDR's administration. Either way, too many paleoconservatives are ignoring that Wolfowitz is not the only thug pressed up against the famous bow, screaming, "I'm the king of the world." Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Woolsey, Bolton, Rice and Powell are right there beside the Jews, hollering, "Me first." Equally, and on the lower decks, Richard Perle is flanked by neoconservative Christians like Gary Bauer and William Bennett.[/QUOTE]
I haven't counted Jewish noses between the two administrations to know who had the most. I do know that F.D.R. had a slew of them surrounding them. Perhaps someone here knows.
It isn't just the Jews involved in this massive ripoff. The gentiles here represent the old establishment that sold out after the War for Southern Independence. This is why the multinationals signed on to this crap. They see an opportunity to maximize their profits with the taxpayers funding and protecting their investment via the D.O.D. However, it was primarily Jews who pushed this from the begining to help their real country- Israel.
The "christian" zionists want some of the action because of their own heretical interpertation of the Bible. I would add that some of these "shepards" are also using these nutty dispensationalist beliefs to feather their own nests.
As for the rest of these whores like Bill Benett are nothing more rank opportunists who if it wasn't for the others, would be non-entities.
There are alot more paleo commentators who have noted the gentile aspect of this than Mercer wishes to give credit to. In short, they are both guilty as hell and one day should have to appear in a federal court dressed in orange jumpsuits and shackled to hear at the very least sedition charges.
2003-09-26 21:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Woolsey, Bolton, Rice and Powell are right there beside the Jews, hollering, "Me first." Equally, and on the lower decks, Richard Perle is flanked by neoconservative Christians like Gary Bauer and William Bennett.[/QUOTE] Aren't Woolsey and Bolton Jews?
In any case, it's all about LEVERAGE which Jews exploit to the maximum. They only had to control ONE goy guy and that was Dick Cheney. Once Bush/Cheney were elected Cheney was put in charge of the "Transistion Team" which selected all the top people for the cabinet and other top administration positions. Bush had no experience in Washington and few connections there so he had very little to contribute to this process. The only outsider is Colin Powell, and I believe GWs old man and friends pushed him to make that appointment over the objections of the neocons. Rice was appointed because she's too weak and stupid to stand up to anybody. The rest are all Cheney's people and he was bought and paid for a long time ago.
2003-09-26 21:06 | User Profile
Wayland,
Yes, you're right about Bolton. He is a Jew. Woosley I am pretty sure is a gentile. Somewhere around here there is a list of Bush's kosher nostra appointees.
2003-09-27 09:09 | User Profile
The argument that Jews act collectively to promote interests which are exclusively Jewish, also means, says MacDonald, that Jewish neoconservatives are in cahoots with the larger "organized Jewish community," all working to promote a Jewish agenda that is "arguably only tenuously related to the interests of the U.S."
Poor Ilana. I really think she's as a clueless as she makes herself out to be.
Two years after Sept. 11, Jews raise concerns about Patriot Act:
"The central reason for the Jewish groups’ hesitancy is that the act’s provisions were designed to target groups that target Jews."
"Privately, some Jewish activists admit that had law enforcement used the tools to target a minority other than Arabs or Muslims, Jewish opposition to the act might have been more pronounced."
"Provisions in the bill, such as the freezing of terrorist assets and new rules for border crossing, can be used by law enforcement to protect Jews, Lieberman said."
The grand-daddy:
"[COLOR=DarkRed]While Jewish law allows for the infringement of individual privacy when lives are at stake, those intrusions should be as limited as possible[/COLOR], Pelavin said.
“We must be vigilant in ensuring that our effort to destroy terrorism does not undermine the very liberties that make this country worth celebrating and protecting,” he said."
A question...why is a Jewish paper conflating Jewish law and the Patriot Act? Michael Chertoff wrote or had a hand in writing large parts of the law, so the case could be made that Jewish neoconservatives are in cahoots with the larger "organized Jewish community," all working to promote a Jewish agenda that is "arguably only tenuously related to the interests of the U.S."
2003-09-27 10:38 | User Profile
Otho,
That is a very fine bit of sleuthing you have done here. Yes, why indeed!?
[QUOTE]ââ¬ÅWe must be vigilant in ensuring that our effort to destroy terrorism does not undermine the very liberties that make this country worth celebrating and protecting,ââ¬Â he said." [/QUOTE]
Celebrating and protecting for their interests. They certainly don't give a damn about anyone else, except when it serves their selfish interests.
2003-09-27 17:48 | User Profile
About the only objection Ilana has is that organized Jewry's promotion of liberal ideology--including its neocon versions--is not in fact good for Jews. Well, no kidding. I am genetically pre-disposed to feel tired if I get up early in the morning, but's that's not good for me either.
One can understand 'Jewish interests' in many ways. Ilana means something like 'what God would want Jews to be interested in.' Others mean 'what Jews are actually interested in.'
2003-09-27 19:44 | User Profile
There is nothing contradictory about Jews supporting Moslem immigration.
Another survey, conducted in 1988 by the Los Angeles Times, asked a national sample of American Jews to name "the quality most important to their Jewish identity." Half chose "a commitment to social equality." The other half were divided evenly among Israel, religion, and "other."
J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, p.71
2003-09-27 20:42 | User Profile
When the Jewish Agenda can be named in the mainstream media as one of the major underlying difficulties facing America, we'll know that the hold is weakening. Until then, its absence in the public debate is our litmus test as aware Americans.
2003-09-27 22:02 | User Profile
It is not as much a unified agenda as it the culture-distorting effects of a powerful and influential minority.
2003-09-27 22:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Indeed, liberalism (and I don't mean classical liberalism) is a pathology Jews share with a good many Americans. [B]Most Jews don't like the Right and that, incidentally, includes the Israeli Right, represented by Ariel Sharon. [/B] [/QUOTE]
Follow the money, honey. Yes, there are many Jews who publicly chide Sharon. But they do not, nor would they under any circumstances, contribute money to Palestinian organizations and are dead-set against any form of income tax resistance (or even repeal!) for we benighted wage-slaves of Judah, being quick to connote tax resistance with Oklahoma City bombings, militias, organized racism/anti-Semitism. Thus what do the pro-Pal photo-op sentiments of wealthy American Jews count for - when they stridently support YOUR tax dollars buying IDF bullets?
Even the most liberal of Jews strongly supports putting more teeth into the Federal income tax which renders all their "criticism of Sharon's regime" entirely moot.
The thousand-dollar-a-plate liberal Jews who shake a disapproving finger at Israeli policy are, to a man, cash contributors to the Jewish state who could, if they wished, fund the Palestinian uprising with a stroke of a pen across a bank draft. Don't, as the saying goes, hold your breath. To my knowledge, the only Jew who does so - and advocates doing so - is Norman Finkelstein, a Jew so despised among his fellows that he stands almost alone as that rarest of subspecies, [I]the honorable Jew[/I].
2003-09-28 01:19 | User Profile
I wonder what all this screeching on a highly trafficked neocon website will do for MacDonald's book sales and general exposure to people who hadn't heard of him before.
Seems this could be another case of "any news is good news" like Shulevitz all over again.
Keep it up, Ilana
2003-09-28 01:27 | User Profile
It is better to focus on the agenda-side of things. This is explicitly laid out by major American Jewish organzations. Therefore, talking about this agenda has much more credibility than reffering to more diffuse activities that we know Jews get up to.
[QUOTE=FadeTheButcher]It is not as much a unified agenda as it the culture-distorting effects of a powerful and influential minority.[/QUOTE]
2003-09-28 23:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Centinel]I wonder what all this screeching on a highly trafficked neocon website will do for MacDonald's book sales and general exposure to people who hadn't heard of him before.[/QUOTE]
Is [u]Culture of Critique[/u] still stuck in iUniverse limbo?
2003-09-29 02:00 | User Profile
Apologia for the Jewish Neoconservatives Dissecting Ilana Mercerââ¬â¢s "Blame The Jews"
by John Allington
Loaded: 9/28/2003
Mr. Allington's comments are in [I]italics.
Ilana Mercer recently wrote a piece carried on WorldNetDaily lamenting the blaming of neoconservative Jews for our war on Iraq. Ms. Mercer is not a neoconservative. She is a libertarian who came to libertarianism through reading Ayn Rand's (Alissa Zinovievna Rosenbaum's) books.
On Mercer's website, she gives her background.[/I]
[url]http://www.ilanamercer.com/Aboutme.htm[/url]
[I]It turns out she is the quintessential wandering Jew. Her father was a Rabbi and anti-Apartheid activist in South Africa who fled to Israel.
Don't you just love how Jews work overtime to destroy a country and then split? What kind of psychopath would want to turn over the best run country in Africa to grub-eating savages? The interesting thing about the end to white rule in South Africa is that everybody will ultimately lose, including the grub-eating savages.
Getting back to Ms. Mercer. She grew up in Israel but subsequently fled to Canada. Later she moved to the United States where she is now a permanent resident (not a citizen).
Don't all of my readers find it interesting how many foreigners, both white and non-white, want to tell us how to run things in the United States? First is the obsequious Englishman and "opinion journalist" at the National Review (who does not have the ââ¬ÅJew thingââ¬Â), John Derbyshire. Next, there is the Russian-Canadian Jew at Frontpagemag, Jamie Glazov.
Then we have the Canadian Jew, David Frum, who created the "Axis of Evil" label for North Korea, Iran and Iraq for one of our president's speeches. What if gentile Americans molded the opinions of their fellow citizens? Would we be sending $3 billion per year to Israel? Would we be calling countries on the other side of the planet evil? Would we allow foreign army bulldozers to crush our gentile citizens (Rachael Corrie) without a congressional investigation while we quietly lobby for the release of a Jewish American citizen (who aided a terrorist organization) from a foreign prison (Lori Berenson)? What if gentile Americans molded the opinions of their fellow citizens?
I am commenting on Mercer's writing because I think she illustrates a number of important points. Even though she disagrees with the war on Iraq, she diverts attention away from the real people and reasons for the war. She writes as if the neoconservative movement is some sort of equal partnership between Jews and gentiles. If you got Irving Kristol into a room and asked him privately, I think he'd laugh at that notion. Almost everybody interested in politics knows that the founding Neoconservatives are ex-Trotskyite Jews from New York City. They became alienated from the left in the late '60s and early '70s as the Soviet Union's treatment of its Jews worsened. This is a fact that is readily admitted and written about by the older new conservatives. Ms. Mercer, sophist that she is, pretends not to know this.
Now on to Mercerââ¬â¢s piece. [/I] [url]http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34794[/url]
[B]Blame the Jews by Ilana Mercer Posted: September 26, 2003
Although the administration's Jewish neoconservatives share the same policy positions as their gentile compatriots, they are being portrayed ââ¬â at times subtly, at times not so subtly ââ¬â as the instigators of the administration's blunders, but more seriously as being agents of Ariel Sharon and his Likud Party, essentially doing Israel's bidding. [/B]
[I]The Jewish neoconservatives do not ââ¬Åshareââ¬Â the same policy positions as their gentile compatriots. The Jewish neoconservatives created those policy positions. When the U.S. Congress wants to understand what the administration's plan in Iraq is, Donald Rumsfeld does not go to the hearing. Who goes to the hearing? Paul Wolfowitz. Geriatric Rumsfeld canââ¬â¢t even articulate his ideas. Wolfowitz is a Jewish neoconservative and one of the main architects of the war on Iraq. When Jewish neoconservatives travel frequently to Israel, have relatives there, announce their strong support for Israel constantly and advocate military action that tilts the balance of power in the Middle East in favor if Israel, what are we supposed to conclude? Where is the neocon concern for Sri Lanka or Angola or Columbia? Where is the pre-emptive war to protect Nigerian oil? Where is the war to transform Pakistan into a democracy? Pakistan's president (general) Pervez Musharraf after all, did come to power through a coup dââ¬â¢etat. [/I]
[B]The chatterboxes promoting this wild-eyed view will concede that most rational people at the time saw through the lies that took us to war. They imply, however, that this was beyond Mr. Bush's ken and responsibilities. Neither was it, apparently, his duty to abide by his campaign commitment to a humble foreign policy. Mr. Bush was simply "bamboozled" ââ¬â this manifestly neoconservative (and unrepentant) president is not responsible for his blind quest for power. [/B]
[I]Ms. Mercer uses words like "chatterbox" and "wild-eyed" to describe the people who believe that Jews are behind our war on Iraq. This is simple rhetorical deception. There's nothing wild-eyed in noting that more than half of the influential advocates of our Iraq war were Jews and that Jews make up only 2 percent of the population. Not only that, but of the most vocal advocates for the war, Jews made up more than 75%. It isn't wild-eyed or crazy to notice something like this. Take a look at the signatories on this letter:
[url]http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm[/url]
Some signed the letters and were never heard from again. Other key Jewish neoconservatives subsequently wrote op-ed pieces, magazine articles, appeared on talk shows and were interviewed by news programs.
If Karl Marx could create an intellectual framework using false assumptions that could ultimately transform half the economic systems in the world and serve as a catalyst for 100 million deaths and a world war, then a bunch of Jewish neoconservatives could convince an alcoholic, mediocre president to invade Iraq as part of his war on terrorism.
If Sigmund Freud could convince thousands of intellectuals around the world that the key to understanding the human mind was to inquire into their subjectsââ¬â¢ early potty training and mom-subject relationships, then a bunch of Jewish neoconservatives could convince an alcoholic, mediocre president to invade Iraq as part of his war on terrorism.
If Franz Boas, Ashley Montague, et al could convince thousands of intellectuals around the world that the civilization that would send men to the moon, harness the atom and double human life expectancy is populated with the same quality of people (and culture) as those who headhunt, eat grubs in the tropics and have no self-generated written language or history, then a bunch of Jewish neoconservatives could convince an alcoholic, mediocre president to invade Iraq as part of his war on terrorism.
I could go on and on. But the point is this. As Schopenhauer said, The Jews are "the great masters of lies." What was true in the 19th century was true in the 12th century and it's true in the 21st century. They will spin anything and everything to their own advantage. They will feign indignation and laugh under their breath as they tell whopper after whopper--and half the time, I think they almost believe the whoppers themselves. These prevaricators need to be collectively bitch-slapped.[/I]
[B]In other words, the Jewish neoconservatives ate the president's homework.
Patrick J. Buchanan, for instance, is perfectly capable of entertaining the "complicity of the president of the United States in perpetrating fraud" when it comes to FDR, who, he claims, lied the U.S. into war with Germany, aided by a forged document. But when it concerns Mr. Bush, Mr. Buchanan finds it "impossible to believe the president would deliberately lie to the nation. Either he was misled, or he was deceived." [/B]
[I]I don't believe the president lied to the nation. I believe our president is a superstitious moron and that his advisors lied to him. The other possibility is that the Jewish neoconservatives actually believe their own rhetoric. Like the other Jewish cultish ideological movements (Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, The Frankfurt School, Boasian Anthropology), the intensity, internal contradictions and ideological certainty of neoconservatism, implies profound movement deception or self-deception. Whether the Jews first lie to themselves and then lie to us or just lie directly to us isn't terribly important. The results are still the same. They alienate us from our overseas racial kin and use our resources to help their racial kin. They use our sons as cannon fodder while their sons attend expensive private universities.[/I]
[B]Perhaps there were fewer Jews to blame in FDR's administration. Either way, too many paleoconservatives are ignoring that Wolfowitz is not the only thug pressed up against the famous bow, screaming, "I'm the king of the world." Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Woolsey, Bolton, Rice and Powell are right there beside the Jews, hollering, "Me first." Equally, and on the lower decks, Richard Perle is flanked by neoconservative Christians like Gary Bauer and William Bennett. [/B]
[I]Here is another paragraph of deception. Wolfowitz and Perle were the primary architects of the Iraq war. Rumsfeld is also certainly one of the core group of hawks. However, Gary Bauer is a religious nut and William Bennet has a gambling problem. These two were not architects of anything, except for fatuous sanctimony. Bolton is one of the most hawkish neoconservatives and he is a Jew. Rice and Powell are both descendents of our former slave population. Rice was trained to be a good house Negress at Stanford's Hoover Institute where she learned the fine art of discerning which way the wind is blowing. Powell trumpets (half heartedly) the party line. Like other Jews, Mercer throws in a whole laundry list of names and then says with a smirk: "See, they are not all Jews, you anti-Semites." Yep, she's right. They aren't all Jews, just most of the ones who really matter. She could then respond, I suppose, by noting that this just shows Jewish effectiveness. Yep, in a "meritocracy," even Jewish warmongers rise to the top. Interestingly, Mercer noted gentile neoconservatives outside of government (Bauer and Benett) but forgot to mention Jewish neoconservatives outside government such as ringleader William Kristol and all of his pals (and dad) over at the stinky neocon nest masquerading as a think tank, AEI (American Enterprise Institute). [/I]
[B]Kevin MacDonald, at least, comes straight out with it. Instead of the cowardly, infantile, and frankly nauseating nudge-nudge, wink-wink insinuations about Jews, he offers grand conspiracy. Jewish neocons recruited all the non-Jews and now manipulate them like marionettes. No mortal (read gentile) could possibly resist a Jewish intellectual ââ¬â that a cabal of Jews allegedly hijacked the administration is because gullible gentiles are powerless in the face of Jewish persuasion, or so it goes according to MacDonald's unique Science of Jews. [/B]
[I]Notice Mercer calling the boys who fail to name the Jew "cowardly," "infantile" and "nauseating?" Men who talk around the Jews earn their contempt. The Jews laugh at such weak boys, the Buchanans, Rockwells and McConnells. The way to deal with Jews is to confront them directly. Identify them as alien radicals who have adopted parasitic modes of existence, exploited host populations and served as the sources of cultural rot everywhere they have wandered.
Mercer again deceives by misrepresenting Kevin MacDonald's thesis. He doesn't call the Jews a cabal; he notes that they form intellectual movements around charismatic Jewish leaders that seek to further Jewish group interests through indirect initiatives. This is a clearly identifiable trend when one studies Freudian psychoanalysis, Boasian anthropology, Marxism, Bolshevism, the Frankfurt School and in the present, neoconservatism. [/I]
[B]The argument that Jews act collectively to promote interests which are exclusively Jewish, also means, says MacDonald, that Jewish neoconservatives are in cahoots with the larger "organized Jewish community," all working to promote a Jewish agenda that is "arguably only tenuously related to the interests of the U.S." [/B]
[I]Mercer again lies. Just because the neoconservative Jews believe that they are advocating what is in the best interest of Jews does NOT mean they are in cahoots with the larger "organized Jewish community." Nor does MacDonald say this. What MacDonald notes is that these Jewish intellectual movements enjoy the protection and support of the Jewish community if they are identified as Jewish movements. Ms. Mercer, while disagreeing with her neoconservative tribe members on the Iraq war, demonstrates this natural tendency to circle the wagons around ethnic adversaries. She writes an opinion piece where her Jewish identity, rather than her political ideology, is the basis for her rhetorical stance.[/I]
[B]MacDonald has proof. Immigration policy "provides a valuable acid test for the proposition that neoconservatism is actually a vehicle for perceived Jewish ethnic interests." "In their attitude to race and immigration," neoconservatives differ from mainstream conservatives, but resemble attitudes held by the Jewish community, he warns.
However, in his messy habit of mind, MacDonald omits that on issues of race and immigration, neocons are not that different from liberals. Jews, of course, are incorrigible liberals. Inasmuch as neocon views are leftist on race and immigration (and the welfare state), Jews would share their opinions. And so would countless other American egalitarians. [/B]
[I]Actually, MacDonald points out in his other writing the liberal origins of neoconservatism. The irony of liberals masquerading as conservatives is lost on Mercer as she rejects the charge of the anti-Semite who argues that neoconservatives are a bunch of dishonest liars. [/I]
[B]Indeed, liberalism (and I don't mean classical liberalism) is a pathology Jews share with a good many Americans. Most Jews don't like the Right and that, incidentally, includes the Israeli Right, represented by Ariel Sharon. It is far from clear that Jews, at large, identify with neoconservatives. Considering that most Americans supported the war in Iraq, Jews, to the extent they supported it, were wrong but not unique.[/B]
[I]Mercer hones her rhetorical skills: "Considering that most Americans supported the war in Iraq, Jews, to the extent they supported it, were wrong but not unique." Mercer well knows that most people don't form their own opinions independently; that's why she's an opinion writer. Most Jews supported the Iraq war because they knew it would liquidate one of Israel's regional threats. Most gentiles supported the war because they listened to years of the media demonizing Saddam Hussein, bought into lies about weapons of mass destruction and were perhaps persuaded by Paul Wolfowitz's doctrine of "pre-emptive" war. Mercer doesn't distinguish any of this because she's either a liar or slow. Nor does she demonstrate some curiosity and inquire into why the perennially dovish, liberal American Jews suddenly turned into hawks when a war with one of Israel's enemies was involved. [/I]
[B]Jewish organizations, as a rule, do promote liberal causes and policies such as multiculturalism. But it isn't obvious that this practice is conducive to the health of the Jewish community. At the very least, there is a contradiction between the leftist ideology so many Jews embrace, with its indifference to assimilation and its extreme tolerance for alternative lifestyles, and the survival of the Jewish religion and people.[/B]
[I]There is no contradiction here whatsoever. Promoting liberal causes and encouraging political activism among increasing numbers of minorities diminishes the political, social, and economic power of the majority population. Liberal causes generate low to moderate levels of social chaos. Some members of the majority population join these causes and help to increase social chaos. Majority members find themselves fighting each other and attempting to manage the effects of social chaos. They divert energy and resources away from their more productive endeavors and this weakens the majority. In this chaos and froth, Jews flourish. They become the social service administrators, the judges, the divorce attorneys, the psychologists, therapists, sociologists, politicians, councilors, activists, diversity consultants, police department trainers, feminist writers, think tank fellows, op ed writers and self help gurus. Is it just a coincidence that Ms. Mercer fits into two of the above categories? [/I]
[B]MacDonald's assertion that Jews support open immigration policies so that they can bring about a more diverse society in order to diminish anti-Semitism" and promote "Jewish ethnic interests" must be questioned, especially in the post-Sept. 11 world. [/B]
[I]For the last forty years Jews overwhelmingly have supported open immigration [url]http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/paper/ABERNET3.PDF[/url] (PDF file), but for the last two years some have begun to rethink this support. Thus it follows that we must question MacDonald's assertion! Hey, I know this guy who raped three little girls over the course of the last thirty years. But he hasn't raped any little girls since September, 2001. Hey, I think we have to question the belief that this guyââ¬â¢s a pedophile! Again, as Schopenhauer wrote, the Jews are "the great masters of lies."[/I]
[B]Jews have little to gain by advocating for minority communities with which they haven't much in common, culturally or socioeconomically, and who are likely to be hostile to them. How does promoting immigration from Muslim countries, for instance, benefit Jewish interests? [/B]
[I]This is not true. Jews have much to gain by advocating for minority communities. If you can convince the gentiles to give equal rights to the descendants of our slaves, then you can certainly convince them to give equal rights to Jews. Jews lobbying for civil rights for other groups is simply self-interest by proxy. And Jews don't promote immigration from Muslim countries per se. They promote immigration from non-white countries in order to dilute the ethnic homogeneity of the U.S. They want a chaotic country full of competing, disorganized groups. In that environment, they know they will rise to the top. How many California senators are Jewish? What percentage of the California population is Jewish? What percentage of the California population is non-white?[/I]
[B]Jewish activism, if anything, is self defeating as a group strategy. The community's egalitarianism is thus more accurately seen as a function of liberal pathology, the same pathology so many Christian denominations exhibit ââ¬â they all believe, mistakenly, that they are promoting justice. [/B]
[I]Here is another statement that doesnââ¬â¢t pass a sophomore logic test. Since Jews have a multi-thousand year history of activism, and since they are still, after all of their years of wandering, a distinct group, then their activism certainly cannot have been self-defeating as a group strategy. Their activism is a central theme in their group identity and focuses on things which benefit them indirectly or directly as a group. Their activism enhances their group cohesion. Their activism often causes anti-Semitism, which is something all Jews rally against and is another important source of their group cohesion.[/I]
[B]All in all, the paleoconservatives' attempts to blame Jews for pervasive gentile madness, such as Mr. Bush's war in Iraq, his lingering presence in Afghanistan, multiculturalism and "mass, non-traditional-immigration," is too silly to sustain, but, at the same time, a little sinister. (Next, MacDonald will hold Jews responsible for loading the Episcopal Church with homosexuals.) [/B]
[I]These attempts are not too silly to sustain. We simply have to look at the composition of those who advocate these policies and notice the anomalous numbers of Jews at the forefront of most of these policies and initiatives. This letter was not authored by a long-haul trucker from Sacramento:
[url]http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm[/url]
It comes from a New York Jew who founded the associated front group that calls itself a think tank. What about multiculturalism? The intellectual origin of multiculturalism is Franz Boas, a German Jew. He created cultural anthropology and mentored Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict. Tinkering with U.S. immigration policy? Ever heard of the Lautenberg amendment, granting special status to Jews living in the former Soviet Union? Of course you have, Ms. Mercer. Youââ¬â¢re a Jew who has been able to country-hop from South Africa to Israel to Canada and then to the United States in approximately 40 years. Do you have any idea how hard it would be for a gentile to accomplish that immigration feat? Maybe you do and maybe youââ¬â¢re just smirking at us dumb gentiles. For nowââ¬Â¦ [/I]
[B]About the Jewish psyche, MacDonald shows complete ignorance: Justified or not, Jews are petrified of anti-Semitism. I used to think they were mistaken. I still believe Jews express this deep-seated fear shamefully and inappropriately [url]http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34722[/url]. But in light of recent scapegoating, I am no longer sure about anti-Semitism's obsolescence. [/B]
[I]Anti-Semitism is not obsolete. It is growing. It is growing for the simple reason that in Western societies, Jews have acquired disproportionate political, economic and media power and they use that power to forward their group interests at the expense of the interests of their host populations. [/I]
[B]The MacDonald Fe-Fi-Fo-Fum Science of sniffing out Jewish intellectual habits makes me (as a Jew) wary of mentioning Sigmund Freud in any capacity. (Certainly not much store should be put on his theories about human nature.)[/B]
[I]Ms. Mercer should be wary of mentioning Sigmund Freud in any capacity. He was a charlatan. Marx was a charlatan. Franz Boas was a charlatan. These men often cited as examples of Jewish genius, were extraordinarily destructive to Western man and our civilization. The tribe who produce these abominations should be ashamed of the damage they have done to our culture. If there is justice, they will pay. I personally await the day for their collective punishment and thank the present Israeli government for establishing the contemporary precedent for it. [/I]
[B]Nevertheless, there's no harm in a joke. When Freud was once quizzed about his incessant cigar smoking, he humorously chose to sidestep what was, according to the very theory he invented, a manifestation of his own oral fixation. He replied: "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." [/B]
[I]I've got another Freud quote for Ms. Mercer. Supposedly when Sigmund Freud was about to disembark in New York City and as they entered the upper bay, he turned to Jung and said ââ¬ÅDon't they know we're bringing them the plague?" He was referring to psychoanalysis. The name of the Jewish intellectual movement changes, but the pattern remains the same.[/I]
[B]And sometimes, anti-Semitism is just anti-Semitism. [/B]
[I]Ms. Mercer: have you ever wondered why anti-Semitism is unique in the world? Have you ever wondered why no other people has earned the enmity of so many other peoples and been kicked out of so many other places over such a large swath of time? Have you ever wondered why anti-Semitism is referred to in the popular media as a mental disorder, but it isn't found in medical textbooks? There is no diagnosis, cure or drug to take for anti-Semitism. Doesn't this bother you? You mock other people's criticism of Jews. You dismiss them. But what you don't do is look in the mirror. Could it be possible that you are wrong and we are right? To think otherwise is an act of extraordinary arrogance. The gentiles are anti-Semites and the poor, inoffensive Jews are just picked on for thousands of years by just about everybody in the Old World for no particular reason? Is that how it really worked, you self-absorbed, arrogant bitch?
Now I have a final question for you, Ms. Mercer. Why exactly do Jews insist upon living among people they claim to believe are dangerous anti-Semites? Is this not an indication of either psychopathology or a necessary requirement for a parasitic mode of existence? For over 50 years your homeland, Israel, has been open to you. Instead, you prefer to live in North America where you have the opportunity to write indignantly about those who criticize your fellow tribe members (who seek to use our wealth and power to enhance your homelandââ¬â¢s security). You Ms. Mercer are either in denial, having deceived yourself, or you are a liar. [/I]
JOHN ALLINGTON
2003-09-29 02:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Don't you just love how Jews work overtime to destroy a country and then split? What kind of psychopath would want to turn over the best run country in Africa to grub-eating savages?
Someone who has a strong committment to "social justice."
The interesting thing about the end to white rule in South Africa is that everybody will ultimately lose, including the grub-eating savages.[/QUOTE]
Well, I'm not so sure about this. I bet De Beers found a way to profit from this chaos. I understand they helped fund the A.N.C.
2003-09-29 03:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Someone who has a strong committment to "social justice."
Nothing to add, S, except that that's a classic. Hilarious but tragic since it actually sold.
2003-09-29 03:31 | User Profile
Ruffin,
Do you have a link for this piece by Allington?
2003-09-29 10:28 | User Profile
It's up on VNN's main page.
[I][COLOR=DarkGreen]VNN: "savagely witty, scabrously incorrect!" - Peter Brimelow[/COLOR][/I]
2003-09-29 11:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius] [QUOTE]The interesting thing about the end to white rule in South Africa is that everybody will ultimately lose, including the grub-eating savages.[/QUOTE] Well, I'm not so sure about this. I bet De Beers found a way to profit from this chaos. I understand they helped fund the A.N.C.[/QUOTE]
Exactly, always follow the money. Far simpler for the CEO of Rape The World Inc. to deal with a few corrupt Negro ministers than a White nation. Sure White men can be bought too, and frequently are, but itââ¬â¢s a far riskier prospect with less dividends. Even better, when SA sinks into anarchy and tribal war the rate of corporate tax shall be 0% with just the minor matter of employing a mercenary company or two to keep the goods flowing. If things get really hairy than just give George W. a ring, I hear he has an army for hire.[FONT=Arial]
2003-09-29 13:51 | User Profile
Fantastic slice up and refutation by Allington on the lies of psychotic opinion makers and culture distorters like Mercer. Absolutely brilliant. Thanks for posting it.