← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · All Old Right
Thread ID: 10057 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2003-09-26
2003-09-26 17:24 | User Profile
I'm trying to verbalize the difference between the original colonies of the USA and the rif-raf freeloaders rushing across the borders to share wealth they have not produced. The best explanation I can think of is that "immigrants" become colonists when they change the character of their destination. What is going on now, by 3rd worlders, is a colonization process? Does that sound like a factual way to explain my objection to this crap about "nation of immigrants"? I need a white nationalist dictionary, anyone publish one. RandomHouse has succeeded in changing English to suit the goals of the Jews. :taz:
2003-09-27 00:26 | User Profile
AOR - That's as good a definition as you could want. Immigrants want to be accepted - to assimilate, blend in, be adopted, so to speak. Colonists seek to recreate what they left (New England, for example) in a new place.