If you read his book and the A+B theorem is so simply disproven, then why does your post not highlight his main error, rather than just using an ad hominem on socred proponents? It doesn't go anywhere to just reject and then make an unsubstantiated assertion without addressing the contents of the post.
Trump's policies must be grounded in the desire to do what is best for his race, not to serve the interests of the parasitic, largely Jewish financial capitalist class (his economic appointments give some pause in that respect.) First and foremost he must end laws and government programs that serve to transfer wealth from healthy decent people to the aforementioned parasitic class and to the botched and bungled herd.
That doesn't mean he should be a shill for big business. All I'm saying is he better not embrace a Neoliberal agenda or he will destroy any credibility he has with Nationalists and blue collar Whites that is, those who form his core constituency and will therefore have zero chance of being re-elected. I'm not saying he needs to be a "White Nationalist" to serve the interests of ordinary White people, the people who allow the country to function, vs. the interests of the parasitic classes, the largely Jewish bourgeoisie and the largely brown lumpenproletariat.
Trump isn't some kind of White Nationalist Nazbol, if you expect that from him you will be disappointed. He is not anywhere close to that ideologically. He'll probably govern as a less-rapacious-than-average neoliberal. There were times during his campaign, and there still are times, where he sounds genuinely pro-working class but whenever his policies officially come out they're very short on anything substantial. Likely his orthodox advisers get to him and steer the outcome to what they prefer, and Trump seems more or less okay with this.