Why You Should Marry a Russian Mail Order Bride

10 posts

Augusto Pinochet
High effort doesn't always yield a better result. In this case, the OP was just a long-winded way of saying that Russian women are hot and have lower standards. Sex tourists like Roosh and Nick Krauser have already beaten that theme to death.

Exhorting men to move to a poor country en masse and snatch up its women would be unseemly in any case, but it's especially bad when the country in question faces severe demographic challenges. Russia is at the start of a population tailspin, especially among ethnic Russians; the last thing it needs right now is a swarm of horny autists descending on it to pillage its pussy.


Watch it, buster.

[​IMG]
HR Professional of Color

Is Roissy consciousness anything like Krishna Consciousness? (Seems like something Roosh would be better at.)

Niccolo and Donkey

I like Roissy for his political observations but upon encountering him for the first time I immediately concluded:

1. he directs his outreach to those that need it; guys who grew up without fathers by way of broken families
2. it's entirely nihilistic in that it's the reaction to the distorted sexual marketplace whereby men are encouraged to just say 'fuck it' and indulge in sexual promiscuity since that is what is on the menu
3. he makes conclusions that those of us from healthy families knew all along

Valley_Quail
Majority of "game" is bullshit in my opinion. Either a woman is in to you, in which case the aspects of "game" that focus on not shooting yourself in the foot are somewhat useful, or she is not, in which case no amount of "game" will create attraction.

"Game" in real life = looks, status, wealth, all of which loop back into each other. Dominant behavior, which seems to be a core component of "game", is the result of those three prior things. A 5'6, poor man with no social circle isn't going to "game" an attractive woman into sleeping with him, again, in my opinion.
Police_Gazette
His blog only makes sense in an Anglo-American-Western-European context; I grew up upper middle class with very few of my peers coming from "broken families," but it's something that I would encourage every one of them to read. I don't expect his writing to appear immediately salubrious to you because your background is so different, if the recent economic and cultural history of former Yugoslavia is anything at all like that of Russia, which is must be, in that it hasn't experienced very much feminist conditioning, and the general poverty inhibits the kind of open depravity indulged by women in the West.

Have you read Roissy?

I wanted to write a longer post about how the contrast between American and Russian women underscores the power of Nurture; I feel that Nurture is under-rated here not just b/c the dissident right is largely a reaction against the de facto blanket ban on biodeterminism, but that it selects for characters with hardened souls who are immune to indoctrination. But I was hoping readers would have been able to pick up the meta-lessons of the post without me having to point it out.
Stars Down To Earth
4. He writes about sex like it's a science-fiction novel

5. Houellebecq is far superior
Police_Gazette
That you'd compare Roissy to Houellebecq at all leads me to believe that you'd read very little of the former.
Sconvolto

Spends years reading Roissy and taking in meta-lessons*

Meets broads on mail order bride websites*

Valley_Quail
I have.

I think some of his ideas are good. Like I said, a lot of it amounts to not shooting yourself in the foot, which is useful advice given that most young men are essentially taught how to screw themselves over in relationships and their dealings with women in general. However I think in the grand scheme of things "game" doesn't improve one's chances nearly as much as investing in some nice clothing, improving one's social standing/status, and amassing wealth.
Police_Gazette

I guess I was just mistaken in assuming, inferring from the high praise this forum had received from some trusted members on Twitter, that most of the posters here would have at least an elementary grasp of the accelerationist mindset vis-a-vis the gynokratie, which rejects the generic pseudo-reactionary stance of exhorting for general "higher morals " in sexual conduct, especially from men, in response to degeneracy, and sees the naked pursuit of male interest as part of the cleansing fire that will spark the cycle of renewal, and the promulgation of the "Gilligan approach" as downright counterproductive. Alas, it's disheartening to see that some of you barely approximates the trade-unionist mindset, much less the revolutionary one.