The Syria Analysis Thread

10 posts

Randall McMurphy

My theory is that Benghazi and the Boston Marathon bombing were political stunts from "Al Qaeda" interests to prove they were not American lackeys--a recruiting ploy of some sort involving a variety of agendas, which include the direction of the flow in arms and cash in Syria, if not exclusive. Of course, that might have dark to very dark implications...

el greco
http://www.sedmitza.ru/text/3681481.html

[​IMG]
[​IMG]
[​IMG]
Cadavre Exquis
Syrian rebel eats heart of regime soldier
Crush these beasts.
Stubby
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/w...s-possibility-of-more-syria-strikes.html?_r=0

Israeli official signals possibility of more Syria strikes


WASHINGTON – A senior Israeli official signaled on Wednesday that Israel was considering further military strikes on Syria to stop the transfer of advanced weapons to Islamic militants, and he warned the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, that his government would face crippling consequences if it retaliated against Israel.
The Israeli official said: “Israel is determined to continue to prevent the transfer of advanced weapons to Hezbollah. The transfer of such weapons to Hezbollah will destabilize and endanger the entire region.”
“If Syrian President Assad reacts by attacking Israel, or tries to strike Israel through his terrorist proxies,” the official said, “he will risk forfeiting his regime, for Israel will retaliate.”
The Israeli official, who has been briefed by high-level officials on the Syria situation in the past two days, declined to be identified, citing the need to protect internal Israeli deliberations. He contacted The New York Times on Wednesday.
The precise motives for Israel’s warning were uncertain: Israel could be trying to restrain Syria’s behavior without undertaking further military action, or alerting other countries to another strike. That would ratchet up the tension in an already fraught situation in Syria, where a civil war has been raging for more than two years.
Nearly two weeks ago, Israeli warplanes carried out two strikes, the first hitting bases of the elite Republican Guard and storehouses of long-range missiles, in addition to a military research center that American officials have called the country’s main chemical weapons site.
A more limited strike on May 3 at Damascus International Airport was also meant to destroy weapons being sent from Iran to the Islamic militant group Hezbollah. The Israeli government did not confirm either of the attacks, which followed one earlier this year.
The Syrian government publicly condemned Israel for the assaults, saying it “opened the door to all possibilities.” The Syrian deputy foreign minister, Faisal Mekdad, declared in an interview with Agence France-Presse, “We will respond immediately and harshly to any additional attack by Israel.” He described the Israeli strikes as a “declaration of war.”
Mr. Assad and Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, have both said in recent days that the Israeli-Syrian border, which has been relatively quiet despite the more than two years of civil war inside Syria, could become a “resistance front,” in response to Israeli aggression.
Niccolo and Donkey
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/embed/9cc-HC1CnJg

link

Stubby
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/w...th-advanced-missiles.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Russia is sending some very capable weapon systems to Syria, including this supersonic anti-ship missile, the Yakhont. This family of anti-ship missiles is far stronger than the Exocet missiles western navies became familiar with in the Gulf and Falklands, and is far more capable than any equivalent western system (like the Harpoon series). Now all that's needed is the Iskander system of ballistic missiles, and maybe the Israelis will think twice before meddling.

Here's a little technical info.

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-Cruise-Missiles.html#mozTocId241813
http://www.ausairpower.net/Analysis-Regional-ASCM.html
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Regional-PGM.html#mozTocId24139
Niccolo and Donkey
Stubby

What about the S-300 missile system?
Stubby
Stubby

BTW for those who don't know, the common and most plausible theory is that relatively inexpensive supersonic anti-ship missiles beat aircraft carriers, although these ones might need Russian operators.

Niccolo and Donkey