The Syria Analysis Thread

10 posts

Niccolo and Donkey
Roland SweetLeftFoot SteamshipTime President Camacho nuclear launch detected Angocachi

This story needs clarification.......

Russian Anti-Terror Troops Arrive in Syria




President Camacho
Excellent news :thumbsup:

50 years after Vietnam and how the tables have turned.... now it is the United States that is hellbent on exporting violent "peoples revolutions" across the globe while the Russians are the only power willing to stand up for the forces of order and civilization.
Team Zissou
Possibly, the Orthodox Church played a hand in this. Also, if the regime falls, Russia may be where Assad ends up.
Niccolo and Donkey
SteamshipTime Roland President Camacho SweetLeftFoot

Liberals challenge Islamist grip on Syrian National Council


Bob Dylan Roof

I find it interesting that the liberals are hostile to the MB. From what I've heard, the MB is comparatively innocuous in comparison to other Muslim political groups; and U.S. Gov isn't threatened by their dominance. The only catch for liberals is that the MB is far more tolerant of more radical Muslim parties.

Thomas777
The thing to bear in mind about the Muslim Brethren is that what we now know as the ideology of ''offensive Jihad'' in the Sunni world was essentially founded by Sayyid Qutb and his followers. He altered the conceptual horizon of how Moslems think about their relationship to state authority and politics, and one of the ways Qutb achieved this was by creating a genuine parallel society in Egypt and Syria that was entirely at odds with Nasserism and B'athism - he had a relatively easy time of this in Syria by the 1960s as Assad's Alawite faction became increasingly tolerant of Communist parties, which alarmed men of religion very much for obvious reasons.

There's a few different views of the MB in the West - there's the liberal and NeoCon/Zionist view that the MB is essentially a Sinn Fein type organization that is the political wing of NSAs with common purposes like Al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad; there's the Scheuer/realist view that the MB is basically a coterie of lower middle class white collar workers, university students, lawyers, and intellectuals that constitutes a think tank of sorts for Islamic thought, that its committed to a ballot box strategy and lacks the muscle of young and violent mujuhadeen in its ranks, and that its easily placated if whatever national government happens to come about in Arab countries at least nominally enforces shari'a.

Neither of these accounts seems to be entirely true, and neither really explains in any complete way why Qutb and the MB remain important in Sunni societies.

We take for granted in the 21st century that Moslem partisans will violently attack political authority in their own countries, but that's actually a major breach with precedent in the Islamic world. Qutb was basically able to convince a substantial minority of Moslems that its entirely congruous with the faith to kill off anti-Islamic elements in Arab lands if they are perceived to be threatening the continued existence of Islam through secularism, institutionalized police state brutality, and things of that sort even if these governments are allowing Moslem people to privately worship unmolested and are defending the territorial integrity of Arab lands.

Qutb in other words demanded that Moslems pursue jihad to defend the faith from not just direct violence against them but also from the ingress of jahiliyya into their societies by globalism, Western soft power, atheistic military nationalism, Communism, Zionism, and what have you.
Angocachi
Great post.

The most important pieces of thought Qutb injected into the Sunni mind was that
-no genuine Islamic government exists today
-modern Muslim society is polluted with pre-Islamic and non-Islamic beliefs and practices that need to be removed by emulating the lifestyle and politics of the first generations of Muslims
-that it is OK to attack your own government if it not Islamic, without permission from phony pro-government clerics, and it's OK to attack anyone who supports your non-Islamic government, including foreign governments and their nationals

The Muslim Brotherhood started as a much more physically aggressive, militant organization... but it's most hardcore elements have been whittled away, often falling in with groups that actually make trigger pulling and bomb making a priority. To survive and for a few potemkin parliament seats the remaining members have softened their rhetoric and become a bunch of faggots who say things like "We want a system based on Islam that represents everyone" rather than the Zawahiri line of "Shariah or fuck you". That left a bunch of Salafis in between who aren't willing to compromise but are also ready to put their names on the ballot, and so we've got Noor.

The US & GCC want secular exiles to takeover in Libya, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen, Egypt and anywhere else a regime falls... but the Islamists in all their variants are seizing the reigns and all they can do now is whisper promises into the ears of the most limp and watered down. Ikhwan could be to Muslim theocrats what the Republican party is to Christian fundamentalists, wooing the religious with rhetoric but never delivering. The problem for Ikhwan, however, is that unlike the US the fundamentalist demographic in the Arab countries is large and has alternatives at the booth and beyond.
Niccolo and Donkey
[​IMG]
Niccolo and Donkey
Angocachi President Camacho Female Philosopher practicing normative ethics SweetLeftFoot

Syria's Muslim Brotherhood rise from the ashes


Bob Dylan Roof